OTL Asylum

OTL, Output Transformerless Amplifier User Group.

Return to OTL Asylum


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates

99.34.117.182

Posted on July 14, 2012 at 07:07:41
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005






Before I go ahead and order parts to attempt a power supply upgrade on my mid or late 90's vintage M-60 MK2's, opinions and guidance from you knowledgable forum members would be very helpful. It seems electrolytic caps of 2200uf rated at 200 volts made by either Panasonic, Sprague, or Cornell Dubilier are available in correct value and physical size. Are any one of these 3 manufactures a better choice? What audible improvement might be gained doubling total capacitance by piggy backing caps from 4 to 8, as I have seen done on another OTL forum thread?

I would also like to update hexfred rectifiers. Are replacing the 2 present rectifiers located on top of the power supply caps with new hexfred rectifiers ( in a different chassis location as I have seen in OTL forum update threads) all that need be changed with this update? What about the 4 smaller rectifiers located to the left of center in enclosed photo? Are they something that could be improved upon?

Are there any other minor updates I might consider attempting without getting too crazy as I'm working with a limited budget.
Den

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 14, 2012 at 11:32:53
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
Vary cool i have the same M60s....i would get the new caps for the input power suy....An the new diodes make diff.... An theres other thing you can do....If the res. i see are on the plates i think thay were one ohms....there gone.... 5ohm...10watt..are on the catiods now this well give better sound....but Ralph well chim-in...an give the info...I have done most of the upgreades my self....have fun...goodluck

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 14, 2012 at 15:29:14
Hi den701!

- For output power stage upgrade chose 105 C temperature rated Elko`s ! , regardless to Elko`s brand name .
- Tyu have right about modification & adding of 5 ohm / 10W cathode resistors for each output power tube triode section separately , that mod will improve output power tubes dynamic current share & operating stability significantly .
- Yours pictures shows that for input & driver stage associated bipolar PSU four Hexfred diodes is already installed there .

Best Regards !

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 15, 2012 at 09:57:56
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005
Thanks Banat and Tyu. So I only need to replace the 2 rectifiers across the PS caps. And there is no other modification needed in respect to replacing these 2 existing rectifiers with 2 new hexfred rectifiers of correct value? Is this correct?

Tyu, so I need to remove the eight 1ohm 5watt plate resistors (pin2)? and install 10watt 5ohm resistors in parallel with the first two PS caps as seen on M60 Power Supply schematic labeled R3,R4, R5, R6. Are there any photos posted showing detail of these updates?

Looked for Elna (Esco?) snap in caps but can not find 2200uf 200volt versions. Do you know of a source?
Den

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 15, 2012 at 11:37:48



den701 & Tyu
Sory if I jump in with my comment , but den701 your intention to place 5 ohm / 10W resistor in parallel with first two PS cap is WRONG !!! , in that way you will short PSU lines and than made Amp malfunction !!! .
For your better understanding of this modification here is schematic of Atma-Sphere M60 Mk.II.3 version , there you can clearly see that there is no more any 1 ohm / 5 W resistors in 6as7g Anodes circuit , but is now connected in each power tube triode section Cathodes circuit ! , altogether you need 16 piece of these 1 ohm /5W resistor for each M60 Amp .
BTW , this 16 piece of 6as7g cathodes resistors can be with up to 5,1 ohm /10W value , the bigger value means better mutual dynamic current share between output power 6as7g tubes triode sections and little beat more stable Amp operation .
Best Regards !

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 15, 2012 at 15:24:06
Schematic in higher resolution here

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 15, 2012 at 15:30:14
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
Well Ralph was using 5ohm on the cathoids...gees thay went to 1ohm 5w...go fig...Ralph well be in monday...this is a great upgread..goodluck

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 16, 2012 at 05:01:56
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005
OK Banat. So the 16 (8 for each amp) anode 1.0 ohm 5 watt resistors connected at pin tube socket #2 are to be REMOVED from circuit. I can see they no longer are present on the schematic you provided. And the 16 cathode (8 for each amp) 1.0 5 watt resistors at pin socket #5 (V5-V12) need to be REPLACED with a larger value of up to 5 ohms 10 watts resistors. Don't worry as I will not make any changes until I FULLY understand.
Den

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 16, 2012 at 07:01:38
Lew
Audiophile

Posts: 10912
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Joined: December 11, 2000
I recently updated to Schottkys, the latest DIY craze, and I like the results. In the process, I removed the hexfreds that had been in my amps for years. Ya gotta keep up with this stuff to be hip.
Based on scuttlebutt to be found on TubeDIY, I used Panasonic TS-ED caps in the 2200uF/200V value, and I like that too. Did I beat my brains out trying different electrolytics? No. But the TS-ED has really low ESR. Yes, IMO increasing the capacitance in the LV PS seems to help bass gutsiness.

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 16, 2012 at 07:37:57
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005
Thanks Lew. I had been leaning towards the Panasonics. More low end oomph is what I was hoping for. I did not realize the Hexfred update was old news. Could you point me towards a forum thread that gets into a Schottsky upgrade?

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 16, 2012 at 08:24:52
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
Schottsky are the best diodes.....
But i have ran bouth in these OTL amps i like 40 watt 300V bridgs...but you cant do better then a Schottsky... less push back..Some say NO push back....there diff than any other diodes!...goodluck ....keep diy going ..have fun

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 16, 2012 at 09:42:27



den701
Yes , all anodes 1 0hm resistors have to be removed from output power tubes circuits .
Here is link with underside picture from Mr. jeffreybehr M60 Amp , there you can clearly see 16 big black power resistors ( 5,1 ohm ) .
8 power resistors is placed on the left top chassis underside , exactly under four 6as7g power tube socket , up and down .
Same thing as you can see is done on the right top underside of the Amp chassis .
From each power tube socket pins terminals nr. 3 & 6 ( cathodes ) goes one 5,1 ohm power resistor soldered to next 2 lug terminal strip .
So except this 16 piece of 5,1 ohm / 10 W resistors for EACH Amp block , you well probably need Four of this 2 lug terminal strip per EACH Amp block for this advanced Amp modification , it is same type as you can see from my attached picture .

 

This here is an older amp, posted on July 16, 2012 at 09:58:09
Ralph
Manufacturer

Posts: 4778
Location: Minnesota
Joined: April 24, 2002
And you should look at the updates of the schematic below.

BTW, I would not be too worried about the sound of the rectifiers so long as you can neutralize them! FWIW, the newer devices are a little easier to neutralize...

The amp in the photos has about 60% of the filter capacity of a new one. We went to a larger value and more of them. There is room on the chassis to add them. I would put the rectifiers away from the speaker terminals, and you can put a 1 ohm 5 watt resistor in series to create a PI network with a capacitor input power supply.

We have a lot more capacitance in the driver too. Essentially its set up so that a signal of any amplitude cannot affect the plate voltage of V4, nor that of V1-3, which is on a separate leg of the supply. This takes a few more caps but you have the room.

Of course, we could update it for you. If we do that work, the warranty reactivates. I understand if you want to do DIY, if so, try to keep it neat:

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on July 16, 2012 at 13:52:16
Lew
Audiophile

Posts: 10912
Location: Bethesda, Maryland
Joined: December 11, 2000
If you go on TubeDIY Asylum, right next door, and do a search on "Schottky" you will find oodles of posts on the subject, none of them are negative. Now that they are available in 600V and 1200V tolerance, there is no reason not to use them, as a DIYer. There were some reliability issues, possibly, with the earliest HV versions, but so far as I can tell the current ones are reliable.

 

RE: This here is an older amp, posted on July 17, 2012 at 17:03:41
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005
Ralph or others,
In regard to neutralizing rectifiers as an important part of audio design, could you in general explain how to go about this? If this is really complex and beyond the scope of a sentence or two. We can let this question go. There is still a LOT about electronics I don't have a real good handle on.
Den

 

RE: neutralizing rectifiers, posted on July 18, 2012 at 08:30:00
Ralph
Manufacturer

Posts: 4778
Location: Minnesota
Joined: April 24, 2002
Is a bit of a trick. You can find stuff for this on the web.

Actually, right now it looks to me like you have bigger fish to fry, rebuilding the output section with the 5 ohm resistors in the cathode circuits and 150 ohm 1 watt resistors in the grid circuits. That'll keep you busy for a while. Let me know if you need any parts.

 

RE: neutralizing rectifiers, posted on July 23, 2012 at 19:17:59
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005
Ok for the time being fellows. I have ordered parts from Ralph and will slowly start doing some upgrading. I suspect I'll be back looking for help during this process. If all goes well I'll post pics and comments in regard to results of the updating.
Thanks for now
Dennis

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on August 25, 2012 at 04:53:17
Satelliteman
Audiophile

Posts: 122
Location: Napier - The Art Deco City of the world
Joined: May 21, 2006
Hi Den 701
Re your request for 200vdc 2200uF caps ... I used BHC AEROVOX ...sourced them from the UK via FARNELL / ELEMENT 14 .
AL-22A222DF200 is the type i used ... 40mm dia x 105 high .
http://www.audio-talk.co.uk/archive/bhccat.pdf

Im not sure if they are made anymore ( in this combination ) - I just looked at the site where I purchased mine , and could not locate them . They were not cheap ... think I paid approx 40$ each for them.
Cheers Stu

 

RE: neutralizing rectifiers, posted on October 22, 2012 at 19:40:33
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005



It has been many weeks since beginning my M-60 update project. We spent so much time out of town during the last couple of months progress was slow. Attached is a photo of one of my updated units. As was suggested power tube cathode and anode resistors were all replaced with 5 and 1 watt resistors.. The old 1600uf PS caps were replaced with 2200uf caps, adding 2 more in the process, increasing total power supply capacitance. I also replaced the jumper wire between pin 1 and pin 3 of the XLR connector with 100 ohms of resistance and grounded the unit chassis. 1 ohm 5 watt resistors were added to the power supply cap arrays which were not present in the original wiring. The 2 rectifiers originally mounted in the center of the PS cap arrays were moved toward the outside of the chassis, away from the speaker terminals. One additional 350 volt 100uf cap was added in parallel with the existing 100uf and yellow cap, 2nd from the right, center of chassis. As seen in my upgrade photo.

So how do the amps sound? Sense of space or air within the audio image is greater. Detail of instruments and vocal nuances are clearer and more focused, some detail unheard before. Low end is tighter with more detail and snap. My nagging persistent low grade hum is gone! Apparent output power of the amps seems to have increased. Higher volume listening does not sound as strained or irritating. The M - 60's have always had a silky smooth tube sound quality, but now even more so. Biasing of the power tubes does not seem quite as persnickety as has always been the case prior to the upgrading. It's all Good!. Thanks to you OTL forum members who offered technical suggestions. Thanks to Ralph at Atma-Shpere for parts and additional update suggestions.

 

Are all these upgreades?, posted on October 23, 2012 at 13:44:30
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
Thanks for your time an giveing the upgreades you did but......let me besure i got this right.....?
so you say
I also replaced the jumper wire between pin 1 and pin 3 of the XLR connector with 100 ohms of resistance and grounded the unit chassis

Is this because you are not runing the Amps bal....?

But if well look at the speakers outputs here an in my amp in this MKll.3 a Zobel of a 7.5 ohm 5-10w an a 0.1 cap are on the outputs....

Is the Zobel OUT?...you did not wont the Zobel? or am i not seeing it in the pic....
An what are the res. across the pos..neg output sup caps in your pic?





 

RE: Are all these upgreades?, posted on October 24, 2012 at 07:17:05
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005
Hi Tyu, My early m-6o's did not have the Zobel network circuitry. This may be an update I will do in the future. Does the Zobel circuit enhance sound quality or is its purpose only to deal with unusual speaker impedance or speaker reactance? I think what you see in my update photo are not resistors but the 2 original rectifiers that I moved from their center location mounted close to the speaker terminals to the farthest right and farthest left PS caps. And you are correct. My system is unbalanced.

 

RE: Are all these upgreades?, posted on October 24, 2012 at 08:30:52
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
Yes ....ok there the 600ohm that should be right at the outputs post.
the 600ohm re.i have in are 10watt...can be a big deal in the sound of the Amp!
What i have found with All Zobels...
Is thay can make or brack the sound...I think most say there for keeping RF out of the Amp or preamp...or Speaker....an it dose that... but i have tuned the sound of tubeamps an speakers with the caps used in the Zobels...
It can be a big deal...mybe Ralph well chime in an say it he still useing the Zobels in his OTLs...goodluck

 

RE: Are all these upgreades?, posted on October 25, 2012 at 07:02:39
den701
Audiophile

Posts: 14
Location: northeast Ohio
Joined: March 9, 2005
So I should replace the existing 2(?) watt 600 ohm resistors at the output posts with larger 5 or 10 watt 600 ohm resistors? And this could improve amplifier sound characteristics and function?

 

RE: Are all these upgreades?, posted on October 25, 2012 at 08:28:40
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
Others well have a diff way of looking at this but for me With these OTLs ...like the Speakers i like Panels....all thing can make the sound diff....Wire..res...caps..tubes....you name it...
These 600ohm res. are the only grond the my amps output sees...so yes if you know the sound you are looking for... you can get closer with the type of res. at the output!
As with the Zobel...goodluck

 

RE: Are all these upgreades?, posted on October 25, 2012 at 11:46:47
Hi Tyu !

Contrary to Zobel network where different combination of RC value relation can have bigger or less influence on Amp HF response and as result different reproduced sound from Amp/Speaker combo,
those two 600R resistors higher power capability hardly can have any influence on final reproduced sound .
As you already know they both serve only to made virtually ground point for output power (Circlotron) stage , actually in the same time they both serve for 6as7g tubes grid returning current path during A2 class of operation , and again they serve as 6as7g grid current limiting resistors , altogether with 6as7g grid stop resistors .
I have no doubt that Mr.Karsten have chosen the optimum resistors values
and power ratings for them .
Best Regards !

 

RE: Are all these upgreades?, posted on October 25, 2012 at 12:44:06
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
As you say
those two 600R resistors higher power capability hardly can have any influence on final reproduced sound .

An as i said
Others well have a diff way of looking at this but for me With these OTLs ...like the Speakers i like Apogee Panels to day....all thing can make the sound diff....Wire..res...caps..tubes....you name it...

I have a pr of M60s2...that i have with Ralphs help done some up greads....but i also have a pr of MA1s that i have diy...an i find that with 14 6AS7s thats 28 triods sec pr ch on the outputs... I can hear any changes i make...I well be the frist to say that JUST diff for Diff sake means nothing....
But if you know the sound you looking for you can get it...with part changes....goodluck

 

Sound that I looking for .... , posted on October 25, 2012 at 13:08:39
....Is without Zobel at OTL output for sure !
, actually since I get older I need more and more of High`s tone ! :)
right now I use one EV T35 connected in series with Cerwin Vega tweeter for High`s reproducers per each channel ,
but seems to me that is steel not enough of High`s for me , another pair of EV ST350 coming very sun to be connected in series with this High`s EV/CV combo.

Regards !

 

RE: Sound that I looking for .... , posted on October 25, 2012 at 14:39:36
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
Yes well here some thing that may help on the topend for you....get 4ea 24ohm 2w..1w... Medelfelm res. parael them to get the 600ohms for the output of the M60s...or if you have biger amps get 5-6watt res. this well push up the top i have found....i have to go with biger wire wond res... like 4ea 24ohm ...like 10w to get a sweeter more rolloff topend for my self... An i have found the sovtek 6SN7 push the top way up...i cant use them to hot for me.... You know this is just My 5cent....Were All diff...but we got have fun.....Looks like the Book of MoreMen is comeing...who Nos....goodluck

 

RE: Sound that I looking for .... , posted on October 25, 2012 at 16:12:15
Tyu

If I understand you correctly than you suggest to insert some 600 ohm power resistors across OTL Amp output terminals to balance the top end ? ,
Must say that there is no any logic to insert pure resistive load of 600 ohm across Amp output terminals ! , but hey man why not to try !!!, Who knows !!! :)
BTW I don`t use any original Atma-Sphere Amps , but now I use DIY OTL Circlotron Amps , which have very similar electrical concept as Atma-Sphere OTL , it is rated around 50W /32 ohms / Ch. ,
2 x 15 W is maximum power which I use for daily listening , for night listening I set them to around 2 x 0,5 W max. , I never shut off this Amps , day or night .
One more thing , regardless to Amps type I always use very big and very good internally dampened compression enclosures for 18`` bass drivers to get most precise and tight bass sound , in extra small boxes I use some German vintage fullrange ovals for mid`s , and those EV/CV combos for highs , speakers crossover network almost not exist , it is very simple network , just for highs and for mid`s speaker .

 

RE: Sound that I looking for .... , posted on October 25, 2012 at 20:28:45
tyu
Audiophile

Posts: 963
Joined: April 19, 2011
You say
Tyu
If I understand you correctly than you suggest to insert some 600 ohm power resistors across OTL Amp output terminals to balance the top end ? ,

Just so were on the same page...
You see the 600ohm res. to ground in the pic of the M60ll.3 outputs right under the Zobel......
I am saying Make these 600ohm res. up out of 4ea. 24ohm 1-2watt MF type pairled for each of the 600ohm res that are there.....
I have found that paireling res.to get the ohms you wont an what type you used can have a big afect on the sound...
An MF type res.CAN move the topend up in some places in the Amps setup....
An i have found that the way the outpus of the Circlotron is setup can chang the sound ezely....
An Ralph told me at one time that He just came upwith the 600ohm res. on the outputs.... 400ohms or 1000ohms would work fine....I have used diff res.ohms there an it well chang the sound.....But most thing do....If you can hear the topend....like i can i not saying this is the best thing to hear the topend like i do...but it makes it ezer to tell diff......goodluck







 

RE: Sound that I looking for .... , posted on October 26, 2012 at 00:18:59
Tyu

Thanks for your clarification !!!

Got it now !

Regards !

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on March 11, 2013 at 17:20:21
john65b
Audiophile

Posts: 326
Location: Chicago
Joined: July 19, 2005
Can someone tell me what all the B+ / B- and Bridge voltages are??
I VOID WARRANTIES

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on March 12, 2013 at 09:29:00
tyuu


 
John...I run my Stock M60s an my Diyed MA1s at 140-150 +-...
Ralph uses Two 5kVA 120 primary 120 secdary right in to the Bridges..for the M60s...An a pr of 10kVA for the MA1
I like the sound of the 140+-...sweeter an i can bias the 6AS7s more...good luck eze Diy Amps an Great sound....

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on March 12, 2013 at 09:32:11
tyuu


 
I for got...The Front end sees 300V +- On the 6SN7s.. Front end gets it own tranfourmer...good luck

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on March 12, 2013 at 09:47:45
john65b
Audiophile

Posts: 326
Location: Chicago
Joined: July 19, 2005
KVA? You need that much current? I know there are 8 tubes /channel, but 5KVA? 42 Amps? Am I doing the math correct here?
I VOID WARRANTIES

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on March 12, 2013 at 11:33:39
tyuu


 
I have no way of cking the Stock VA...on the M60s...But the MA1 i have diyed i used Two 10kVA dul winding 120-120 isolation tranformers ....
Sounds killer...an picup two of the same type 5kVA tranfourmers for a diy pr of M60s...but after the MA1 never got to it....Here if Fl it to hot to run this type of amp... i moved on...great sound...i have had these amps for ten years...Have Fun.... OTL king Ralph are other can give there input....good luck

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 9, 2014 at 00:02:08
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
"Schematic in higher resolution here".
kbsb,
could you please display it far anybody?

Many thanks!
Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 12, 2014 at 07:38:49
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
Dear Banat,

could you say the reference voltages across the network of bias of the output tube?
In the schematic you displayed, I read B+(2) on the side of the and and at the 221k resistors (I assume +120V?) , and on the side of the 221.4+110k resistors I read a symbol like "ground". I believe it should be instead a negative voltage. Could you explain (and suggest also the remaining voltage supplies B+/- (1)?
Many thanks

Best regards
Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 12, 2014 at 22:42:44
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
Dear Banat,

thank you for your answer although for some reason it is not visible.
However I assume the biasing network should be reasonably connected between B-(2) (not B+(2)) and ground, and the cascode section should work with about +/-400V.
I am interested finding your impression that a differential cascode amplifier section sounds better than two differential sections in cascade.
Many thanks again!

Best regards

Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 12, 2014 at 23:25:38
Roberto

I have some serious difficulties to log-in and upload images on AA site , but first time when have chance to upload M60 schematics I will do that ,
any way your observation is correct that bias network is supplied Only from B-(2) and between ground point ,but Not between B-(2) and B+(2)and ground .

Salute !

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 15, 2014 at 03:28:00






Roberto

I`m not found anywhere original schematic of Atma-Sphere M60 -Mk.II.3 in higher resolution than 15kb or so , so I made quick redrawn from original M60 schematic , hope will help you .
BTW , I suggest you to sign up on DIY Audio site ( it is for free ), there you can find separate topic dedicated only for DIY Atma-Sphere M60 OTL Amp which include many valuable information, explanation and suggestion .

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 15, 2014 at 04:53:32
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
Dear Banat,

thanks a lot for your inputs: I go to sign me up.

If you have listening experience with M60, could you say your impression when it is coupled to loudspeakers of 4 ohm or 8 ohm with no negative feedback?

If the power tubes are biased with the maximum allowed total current (0.8 A - 1.0 A), did you measure the maximum current driving the loudspeaker which is compatible with perfect sound? This parameter should characterise the amplifier, and it would be better assessed using 4 ohm loudspeaker, as it allows reaching more easily this maximum current while managing moderate sound level.
Sincerely
Roberto


Many thanks!

Sincerely
Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 20, 2014 at 22:18:44
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
Banat,

in order to better clarify my last question, I would like to know if you even experimented that classB regime (i.e., operations with current on the loudspeakers higher than 0.8A-1.0A) should be significantly detrimental for the sound quality, also during quiet music programs.
In this case, the M60 should be only recommended for high impedance loudspeakers, and no hope should be to couple it with standard 8 ohm - 4 ohms loudspeakers, although small monitors.

Thanks
Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 21, 2014 at 03:37:18
Roberto

Pure Class B regime by definition mean 0(zero) mA bias for output power stage (OPS) section, which in case of AT M60 will produce to much distortion regardless to connected load(speaker)nominal impedance , and is in the same time highly undesirable bias set up point for M60 OTL amp .
Normally M60 OPS is biased with 60mA per 6as7g (6h13c) triode section , which is 0,06A x 16 section = 960mA = 0,96A of total idle current.
Which also mean 0,06 A x 140VDC = 8,4W idle dissipation per OPS each triode section , or 8,4W x 16 section = 134,4W of total idle dissipation .

M60 OPS use sliding bias scheme , for example :
With inserted 4 ohm of load ( speaker) impedance OPS will work in AB2 class regime , with 8 ohm OPS will work in A2 class regime producing 60 W, but with 16 ohm M60 will produce 80W and in the same time output power tubes will run cooler and will last significantly longer .
But even nominal 32 ohm load(speaker) is an considerable good option for M60 OTL Amp .

Best Regards !

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 21, 2014 at 06:12:04
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
Banat,
sorry, but I would know if you identified difference in the quality of sound for given piece of music (preferably classical) by working, changing the volume level, below and above the idle current on the loudspeaker, i.e, across about 4W for 4 ohm or 8W for 8 ohm.
Thanks

Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 21, 2014 at 06:23:07
Roberto

Sorry but I have no answer on your questions , since I never made such measurements or listening test , and I don`t use nominal 4 or 8 ohm loudspeakers but 16 ohm for my OTL ,and I don`t like to listen classical music :)

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 21, 2014 at 13:20:39
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
Banat,
besides tests of measurements and listening I am performing, my question was connected to the comment of Stephen Key about the different available OTL solutions in: http://www.tubecad.com/2008/03/blog0137.htm :
"...Circlotron amplifier: its plain simplicity and its inability to squeeze class-A blood from class-AB stones".

As you should be much more expert than me, you should be able to interpret this sentence.

Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 21, 2014 at 15:46:47
Roberto

I not visit Tube Cad site for long time , and I don`t know who is that Stephen Kay , and basically that sentence `` Circlotron amplifier : .....`` mean really nothing to me .
------------------------------------------------------------
BTW , as I remember sometime and somewhere you can found suggestion that AT M60 OTL Amp not work in A2/AB2 regime but in AB1 class , which I consider as nonsense .
If you want to build AB1 class OTL Circlotron amp based on 6as7g power tubes than you need Totally Different design approach from AT OTL design .
For example : both B1/B2 OPS PSU`s need to be at least doubled in value , from 140VDC to 280VDC , but in the same time need to be reduced OPS each triode idle current value to 30mA ,just to get the same static Wa anode dissipation of 8,4W , and to obtain Wa to remain in SOA region which allow max 13W static dissipation for each 6as7g triode section .
Since this AB1 class OPS is now shifted in highly non linear region of dynamic operation next step what we need to do is to find the way how to reduce now both high level of produced THD and the OPS internal impedance .
Single way to do that is to implement gross level of GNFB ,but before that we need to design input VAS with min. 60 - 70 db of gain , which is in the same time and the amp open loop gain , just to allow to wrap around 35-45 dB of GNFB just to get decent amp with 25 dB of closed loop gain , and acceptable both low level of THD and amp internal resistance .
This above described design principle is not new , it is common for many Futterman based AB1 class OTL amplifiers ,and for many other OTL`s to ,
But it is Not common design principle for Atma-Sphere OTL amps .

And yes , I`m interested to see your measurements results and your conclusions .

Edit : Roberto I`m not consider myself to be a big expert ,I`m just profesional TV mehanicus ( I repair broken TV set`s for living ), but who sometime made some DIY stuff .

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 22, 2014 at 19:34:44
cpotl
Audiophile

Posts: 1002
Location: Texas
Joined: December 6, 2009
"besides tests of measurements and listening I am performing, my question was connected to the comment of Stephen Key about the different available OTL solutions in: http://www.tubecad.com/2008/03/blog0137.htm :
"...Circlotron amplifier: its plain simplicity and its inability to squeeze class-A blood from class-AB stones"."

The article is actually by Jon Broskie. The remark is referring back to more extensive discussions he has given in previous articles, including the rather detailed one called Cars, Planes, and Circlotrons (linked on that same page (quoted above). Amongst other things, he makes the point that the power range for which the circlotron actually operates in class A is only up to the point where the output current reaches about twice the idle current. For power levels above that, the operation is essentially in class AB. The upshot is that except at rather low power levels, the operation of the circlotron is generally in class AB.

Chris

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 30, 2014 at 14:38:02
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
?Circlotron amplifier: its plain simplicity and its inability to squeeze class-A blood from class-AB stones".

Chris,

thanks for the information, but the relevant point should be to demonstrate that when a circlotron amplifier (or in general a good audio amplifier) transits from class A to class AB operation, this produces also audible musical differences supported by double-blind tests.

This outcome would corroborate the aforementioned colored sentence that refers "stones' to the class AB operation.
Do you have any information about double-blind musical tests on circlotron class A/AB operations? It should not be difficult to make it, or better, this test should be much more fruitful than dissertations on electronic techniques, cars and plans.

Sincerely
Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on September 30, 2014 at 16:12:12
cpotl
Audiophile

Posts: 1002
Location: Texas
Joined: December 6, 2009
The question of whether the amplifier is operating in class A or in class AB is really just a technical one, answerable without any need for listening tests. It's a question of whether the output tubes are conducting during the entire cycle of the output waveform, including the "bottom half" where the current flow through that particular bank of tubes is reducing below the idle current rather than increasing above it. John Broskie's point, on this topic, is that roughly speaking if the signal level is such that the peak current in the "top half" of the waveform exceeds twice the idle current, then the current in the "bottom half" will have fallen essentially to zero, and so the amplifier will be operating in class AB. This sets a rather low limit on the power level for any practical OTL before it transitions from class A to class AB. There is no particular difference between circlotrons and totem-pole OTLs in this regard.

Of course, there is the very different question one could ask, as to whether an OTL sounds good when it is operating in class AB, and is the transition from class A operation at lower power to class AB at higher powers audible. I think it is generally agreed that OTLs tend to sound very good, even though they are mostly operating in class AB, and certainly my own experiences bears that out.

I'm not quite sure what double-blind listening tests one might usefully try, since a given amplifier is going to transition from A to AB at some specific power level. I suppose one could compare it at different idle bias levels, since that would alter the transition point. But it would alter lots of other things too.

Chris

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on October 1, 2014 at 01:56:34
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
“Circlotron amplifier: its plain simplicity and its inability to squeeze class-A blood from class-AB stones”.

Since the choice of a certain amplifier would mainly result from better sound qualities, outcomes of objective listening tests should have more space in discussions.
In order to perform these tests, the following indications should be considered:
1) Operate in conditions suitable for enabling identifying the effect of only the parameter under exam, for example, the current delivered to loudspeaker for given idle current of the OTL output stage. In this regard, I don’t see difficulties in this sense considering fantasy and large experience in electronics displayed with abundance in discussions;
2) Choose music pieces whose original source does not use microphones and amplifiers, e.g., classical music, that listeners can naturally experience in concert halls, in place of pop music enjoyable at the stadium;
3) In listening impressions, focus mainly on marked differences (if occur) and, only in a further step, eventually, move to double blind tests that would assess differences. In my experience, in case double blind test was necessary, significant differences would not exist.

I encourage people (especially audiophiles, in the literal sense) in following this path, which should be, for sure, much less sterile than that needing using words, in vague and magical sense, like “blood” and “stones”, which are misleading, not suitable for a bit more objective approach that our field deserves, and should fit instead perfectly for commenting baseball or football matches.

Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on October 1, 2014 at 05:02:53
cpotl
Audiophile

Posts: 1002
Location: Texas
Joined: December 6, 2009
"should be, for sure, much less sterile than that needing using words, in vague and magical sense, like "blood" and "stones", which are misleading, not suitable for a bit more objective approach that our field deserves, and should fit instead perfectly for commenting baseball or football matches."

I think John Broskie was just employing a small linguistic tool to eliven his discussion, in the form of the common English idiom "getting blood out of a stone," which can be translated as "something that cannot be obtained, regardless of how much force or persuasion is used." It is quite an apt idiom, in fact, to describe the inability to get class A operation from an OTL.

John Broskie's article "Cars, Planes and Circlotrons" is actually very nicely written and could certainly be considered to be a very objective one, I think. As are most of his articles. He may ruffle a few feathers now and then when he tackles some of the sacred cows of the audiophile movement. But his articles are always well-reasoned, and based on sound physical principles.

Chris

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on October 1, 2014 at 06:07:14
roio
Audiophile

Posts: 35
Location: Frascati (Rome)
Joined: September 3, 2014
“Circlotron amplifier: its plain simplicity and its inability to squeeze class-A blood from class-AB stones”.

Chris,

The linguistic sense was kept as in Italy we say the same. However, the relevant point for me (mostly audiophile with little passion for electronics) is to demonstrate that class-AB operation of a well designed circlotron amplifier (with proper power supplies, etc.) sounds worse than in class-A.
You communicated (thanks) your impression that class-AB sounds also good: "I think it is generally agreed that OTLs tend to sound very good, even though they are mostly operating in class AB, and certainly my own experiences bears that out."

Therefore I don't find reasonable to refer the class-AB operation to as the concept of "stone" rather than "blood". Why not vice-versa if audiophile impression should be more important?
Instead, if the context was that of an electronic designer who aims, for a certain reason (that should be explained), to prefer class-A operation, I would have found more understandable the sentence in object that remains, in my opinion, misleading more than obscure for audiophiles.
Indeed, your aforementioned impression of audiophile should prevail in our context, better if supported by objective results (in the sense I explained).

However, in the mentioned article, any sound test information was not contained to be usefully compared with technical data in dissertation. For this reason, I have found it, instead, tedious (sorry).

To follow my indications should not difficult to make in practice, and I am sure people have already done something like that before. In case, I invite them to share their reports (as asked already before).
I am focussing now on that, and I will let you know.

Roberto

 

RE: M 60 MK2 PS and hexfred updates, posted on October 1, 2014 at 08:29:26
cpotl
Audiophile

Posts: 1002
Location: Texas
Joined: December 6, 2009
"Therefore I don't find reasonable to refer the class-AB operation to as the concept of "stone" rather than "blood". Why not vice-versa if audiophile impression should be more important? "

I think John Broskie was making a gentle dig at some of the claims one occasionally encounters that some OTLs do succeed in operating fully in class A, and so within that context I think his usage of the idiom was not wholly inappropriate.

But I do agree that what really counts is how the amplifier actually sounds. In fact, it strikes me as being a pity that sometimes the essential point about how good the OTL sounds is in danger of being overshadowed by claims, that appear to lack justification, that it is operating fully in class A. There is actually nothing shameful about operating in class AB!

Chris

 

Page processed in 0.063 seconds.