Digital Drive

Upsamplers, DACs, jitter, shakes and analogue withdrawals, this is it.

Return to Digital Drive


Message Sort: Post Order or Asylum Reverse Threaded

Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III

99.231.128.75

Posted on May 9, 2009 at 14:23:45
sixty9@gmail.com
Audiophile

Posts: 31
Joined: June 4, 2008
Hi,

Just thought I’d share my experiences over the past month for those who are interested.

My system: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sixty9/3450193900/

Sample of music listened to:
-Chesky’s “The Ultimate Listening Disc” CD 1.
-“Kind of Blue” album by Mile Davis, 50th ann. Reissue
-“Autum Leaves” album by Jacintha
-“Ports of Call” by the Minnesota Orchestra conducted Eiji Oue
-“Ok Computer” album Radiohead 2009 reissue

Pass Labs D1 (http://www.passlabs.com/pdf/old%20product%20manuals/d1_om.pdf):
-release in 1997
-4 x pcm63k 20 bit multibit DAC
-24-position analogue volume control
-Mosfet single-ended class A output stage.
-2 power transformers separately used for Digital and Analogue.

I got this DAC for $2000 USD. It’s a 12 years old, but after reading about some people’s opinions on the current state of digital (eg. http://db.audioasylum.com/cgi/m.mpl?forum=digital&n=115000&highlight=90s&r=) I thought I’d give it a try. I wanted an analogue volume control as from my experience you do lose detail and musicality from a digital volume if you turn it down too low (which you need to do for normal listening levels as usually line out levels are high). I did take into account that I couldn’t play my growing hi-def library with a 20 bit DAC, but figured the music I really listened to was only available on 16/44 format anyways.


First Impressions: Pass Labs D1 vs my old Meridian 568
The Pass Labs D1 is in another league. More detail, better dynamics and tone, and I was struck by how smooth and analogue it sounded. The bonus is that with its analogue volume control, I could turn down the volume low without feeling I was losing detail.


Shootout: Pass Labs D1 vs EMM Labs DCC2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III
Of course I was very excited to compare/showoff my new DAC and invited 2 friends who brought their own DACs.
I’ve been fortunate to borrow the EMM Labs before and I’ve been blown away about everything about it. Compared to my Meridian, the EMM sounds like an actual instrument versus just a lowly piece of electronics.
I played music on the Pass D1 while we warmed up the other DACs. Everybody in the room agreed the Pass Labs was detailed, smooth and analogue sounding. Then I connected the EMM Labs (with the same cables). My jaw dropped. The EMM sounded much more impressive. The tones were fuller with more body and a more forward presentation. The Pass Labs in comparison sounded thinner and more laid back. The EMM’s lusher sound filled the sound stage. And what struck me was that it was smoother than the Pass Labs. One friend pointed out that the EMM had a more digital sound while the Pass sounded more like vinyl. Whatever it was I was a bit crest fallen as we continued to listen to music on the impressive EMM. Then a strange thing happened… I put on Miles Davis and the EMM didn’t sound right to me at all. We put the Pass Labs back on and Miles sounded right again. There was something about the EMM I couldn’t put my finger on.. but I started to realize as impressive as it was it didn’t sound as real as the Pass.
We ended the shootout listening to the Meridian and PS Audio (using the EMM as a preamp). That friend ended up buying my Meridian and selling off his PS Audio.


Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva
A week later the 3 of us went to a local dealer to listen to the Weiss; I brought my Pass. The test system consisted of Magico V3 speakers and Reference Ayre Amps and Preamps, CD players.
We compared the Weiss vs the Pass as DACs, using the Ayre preamp (since the wWeiss was already connected to the preamp). The Weiss struck my as having a similar lush/filled out tone and forward sound of the EMM, my friends concurred. However, while my Pass sounded analogue, smooth, organic, and musical, to my ears the Weiss sounded harsh, and sterile. It was not musically engaging at all. I could not imagine the musicians were in front of me: it sounded like the sound was coming from a stereo, digitally processed. We later heard the Weiss bypassing the preamp. While the music sounded more direct, I had the same reaction as when listening to my Meridian’s digital volume: that I needed to turn up the volume to hear any detail.


Pass Labs vs EMM Labs Redux.
Perplexed by the sound difference of the EMM and the Pass, another comparison was set up, after which we swapped DACs for a week.

Here are my thoughts, for what it’s worth.
The EMM does not have more detail than the Pass. If anything, it hides detail. What it seems to me is that the EMM (and the Weiss) seems to inflate the mid range. The tones are fuller and more spatially “there”, but at the costs of overshadowing the finer details. While tones will sound more lush and sweet on the EMM, the transients and dynamics are overshadowed by this inflated tone. The Pass, on the other hand, reveals everything. Dynamics are greater, sound stage is deeper, it’s more apparent what type of room the performers are in. Consequently, the Pass is musically engaging and sounds more real.
The inflated tone of the EMM can also backfire on itself as not all recordings react well to this process. For instance, older recording will just sound worse on the EMM, while the Pass manages to bring out the magic.
Finally, the EMM (and the Weiss) sound very digital. It does not sound like the unamplified live performances I’ve been to (orchestral and jazz).
I don’t believe the Pass Labs is perfect, but like my Apogee speakers, it appears to be one of those classics that still roll with the best of them. There are qualities I admire about the EMM. The fuller tone can be pleasant sounding and addicting (especially on orchestral pieces), and it seems to have less distortion than the already low distortion Pass, which results in a slightly smoother presentation.

 

Hide full thread outline!
    ...
Very interesting observations. Much appreciated. N/T, posted on May 9, 2009 at 21:34:23
panhead
Audiophile

Posts: 920
Location: chicago
Joined: January 20, 2007
Thanks

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 10, 2009 at 01:08:17
fmak
Audiophile

Posts: 13158
Location: Kent
Joined: June 1, 2002
Thanks; I have two questions:

How much does the source (transport) influence the outcome?

How much does the connecting digital cable have?

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 10, 2009 at 11:34:29
sixty9@gmail.com
Audiophile

Posts: 31
Joined: June 4, 2008
I'm not sure exaclt what you're asking. From my experience the Pass, Emm, Meridian, and PS Audio are sensitive to the transport. Not sure about the Weiss since I only heard it at the dealer. But the Transport doesn't change the major characteristics of the DACs.

On my Pass, I get the best performance using my PC with a nordost optical cable. Coax from my PC seems to bring a bit more detail, but at the cost of harsh highs that induce listening fatigue. The Toslink definitely brings a smoother sound. I've also tried the Wadia itransport, and didn't like that at all.. very harsh and grainy, not very musical. I've also had the opportunity to try the Monarchy DIP reclocker (toslink from the PC, coax to the DAC). The Monarchy actually reduces the performance: loss of detail, soundstage, blackness, and dynamics.

I've tried the monarchy set up on the Emm labs and i get a similar reduction of performance.

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 10, 2009 at 12:36:54
docmark
Audiophile

Posts: 132
Location: British Columbia
Joined: October 20, 2006
I own an EMM Labs DAC2 and TSD1 transport, connected by a glass Optilink cable. The sound is decidedly not digital. I'm surprised you came to that conclusion with your comparison testing. What transport did you use?

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 10, 2009 at 12:56:32
sixty9@gmail.com
Audiophile

Posts: 31
Joined: June 4, 2008
I use a audio-dedicated pc, details of which can be found here: http://www.flickr.com/photos/sixty9/3450193900/

Before I got my Pass Labs D1, I never considered the EMM Labs as digital sounding either. It had struck me as possibly the epitome of what a DAC could do. It’s only after I compared it to the analogue-sounding Pass Labs was it apparent that the DCC2 is actually quite digital.

 

I Could Have Predicted This.........., posted on May 10, 2009 at 13:10:36
Todd Krieger
Audiophile

Posts: 37333
Location: SW United States
Joined: November 2, 2000
I've always thought digital audio playback peaked in the 1990s, and this shootout kind of bears this out.

Thank you for the contribution.

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 10, 2009 at 21:52:44
fmak
Audiophile

Posts: 13158
Location: Kent
Joined: June 1, 2002
May I suggest trying a new soundcard? I had the RME968 which never produced the kind of results that the Streophile review implied it should. The Lynx AES16 is better, but the RME9632 is better still. All my cards required relocking with a Big Ben to produce results closer to my dCS 972/954 system, which rivals vinyl. I have found the PC power supplies to have a major influence on transparency. In particular, all PCs appear to have cyclical 25-30 Hz pulses (on top of 100Hz ripples) in the supply, presumably in line with cpu load requirements, that are very difficult to suppress. Reducing this has a major impact on improving transparency.

The 9632 in the ESS 9018 dac balanced capacitorless output is very good and almost 'analog'

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 11, 2009 at 04:22:27
sixty9@gmail.com
Audiophile

Posts: 31
Joined: June 4, 2008
Thanks for the advice, I'm always looking for avenues to upgrade my system, and i have been weighing options to improve my transport. But are you suggesting the transport has skewed my the results? That the EMM labs sounds more digital because of the transport?

But since the Pass sounds very analoge, why would the transport make one dac sound digital but not the other? Are you suggesting that a 12 year old dac is less tranport sensitive than a supposed state of the art DAC?

As well, the transport for the wiess was a flagship Ayre CD player.

I understand that i don't have the ultimate transport, but i have a hard time believing that jitter would alter the fundamental characteristics of a DAC. As well, if a less jitter would change the sound of the EMM from digital to analogue, what would it do to the Pass Labs? Real life?


 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 11, 2009 at 04:49:34
sixty9@gmail.com
Audiophile

Posts: 31
Joined: June 4, 2008
Sorry, if the above post sounded a bit sarcastic.. i've just woken up and haven't had my coffee yet.

I would also like to note that i have heard the Emm and Pass labs on my friend's system, he uses the Emm as a master clock with his transport. So theoretically that should bypass jitter worries. My impressions of the 2 dacs on his system were the same.

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 11, 2009 at 06:33:55
fmak
Audiophile

Posts: 13158
Location: Kent
Joined: June 1, 2002
All transports I have tries sound different. I relock my transorts with an Apogee Big Ben, having tried a number of relockers (some of which are not good). I have even tried mulitple relockers and several makes of 'magic'clocks

PC sound card outputs are poor, both RMEs and the aes16 (skewed output digital wave form, overshoot and hf oscillations). If you listen only to 44.1 files, it is very difficult to sort out what sounds digital, the transport, dac or the material. As I said undesirable power supply effects in PCs are very real and do affect sonics greatly.

I do not listen to CD rates at all, either upsampling with a dCS 972 with boxed tyrasnports or using Audition 3.0.1 to upsample wav files. then, I find it much easier to tell the differences amongst dacs.

Not everyone will agree with this, but this is what I have found over long periods with different systems.

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 11, 2009 at 06:37:08
sixty9@gmail.com
Audiophile

Posts: 31
Joined: June 4, 2008
Have you tried the Empirical Audio Pace Car? I'm sort of interested in that.

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 11, 2009 at 07:50:56
fmak
Audiophile

Posts: 13158
Location: Kent
Joined: June 1, 2002
See my email pl

 

Ayre as transport, posted on May 11, 2009 at 08:29:55
Charles Hansen
Manufacturer

Posts: 6984
Joined: August 1, 2001
>> the transport for the wiess was a flagship Ayre CD player. I understand that i don't have the ultimate transport... <<

Actually the Ayre is a damned good transport. The S/PDIF output is treated with the same care as the master clock sent to the DAC chip. The S/PDIF signal is re-clocked by the master clock and balanced signals are sent to a high-performance pulse transformer (for galvanic isolation) on impedance-matched traces.

Are there better sounding transports out there? Probably. But not many, and almost certainly for a much higher price.

 

What do you think of this Pass D1 review (midrange champ, rolled off at both extremes)?, posted on May 11, 2009 at 09:17:56
carcass93
Audiophile

Posts: 7181
Location: NJ
Joined: September 20, 2006
How does reproduction of frequency extremes compare to EMM and Weiss, in your experience?

 

RE: What do you think of this Pass D1 review (midrange champ, rolled off at both extremes)?, posted on May 11, 2009 at 11:32:08
sixty9@gmail.com
Audiophile

Posts: 31
Joined: June 4, 2008
Compared to the weiss and EMM, it hasn't struck me as being rolled off at the extremes.

I'd like to think my system is resolving enough to detect this. I've certainly tried interconnects, speaker cables, and power cables in my system that have rolled off the extremes, but with my existing cable set (Jena Labs Symphony XLR IC's, Nordost Frey speaker cables, and VH Audio Airsine's) I don't hear any rolled off extremes.

 

But my system IS resolving enough..., posted on May 11, 2009 at 18:01:59
George Mann


 
And I find the D1 to be perfectly balanced, having no frequency range deficiencies.

Infact, I find the D1 to be one of the very best D/A's across the board at ANY price!

 

Sure Accuphase must have something better!, posted on May 12, 2009 at 07:37:05
bjh
Audiophile

Posts: 18614
Location: Ontario
Joined: November 22, 2003
The DC-801 for example? ... BTW one thing really strikes me about the DC-801 ... appears they robbed Aesthetix for the new look!

LOL

Everything matters, don't forget to tweak your placebos!

 

Yes, I own the DC-801..., posted on May 12, 2009 at 16:24:52
George Mann


 
And it is currently the benchmark in digital reproduction!

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 13, 2009 at 12:20:03
Bombaywalla
Audiophile

Posts: 494
Location: East Coast
Joined: September 17, 2002
while I have not personally heard the Weiss Minerva, my brother visited a mutual friend's house who owns this DAC. In that system, the Weiss is used in the 24/192KHz mode & is connected to his computer to playback digital files. My brother was of the similar impression as you - digital sounding & harsh. This mutual friend has a BOW Technologies CDP & a Meridian 808.2i that fared much better than the Weiss Minerva.
On another forum I have read people rave (to high heaven) of the Weiss Minerva DAC that almost compelled me to serious consider getting one myself but I'm happy that I waited as it does not seem to be what's it's cracked up to be.....

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on May 14, 2009 at 06:23:35
sixty9@gmail.com
Audiophile

Posts: 31
Joined: June 4, 2008
I think it's really about what DAC's have the people raving about it heard before?

 

RE: Pass Labs D1 vs Weiss Minerva vs EMM Labs Dcc2 vs PS Audio Digital Link III, posted on March 12, 2010 at 06:43:17
nice written mate
with pointing important things and keeping
marketing and so called magic off side ;-0

must say that I agree with you ,having exactly the same filling about machines like weiss ,emm labs or dcs.

they sound impressive in 1st contact ,but later on you recon the music you like ,the feeling of sounds and simple musicallity - it gone somewhere and what had been left insted is just details and high resolution.after all too high and fatiquing a lot.

what is nice when you swap discs and listen an hour it 's not any longer
if you looking for long time relaxation with music :-)

i had similiar deja vu with my dac ,which is still SF P3 .
i sold it got further ( that's what I though ;-)

then came back ,just upgraded my old good machine ,reclocked ,and changed some parts for really beter ,which were not available when it was supplied to the market.

now my Processor 3 is upgradrd to SE+ and I love the sound !
I write it to say you that maybe you should lookaround to find solution for reclocking your own machine ,as you will give up with jitter ,get better as 2 ps is a typical figure today ,and an overal character of your pass will stay untouched.

personally i like a lot a balance of pcm 63 ,and my old an3 se imploying this chip used to be one of the great classics and still is.

this chip has best bass definition ever ,better even than my personally beloved ultra analog chip .

atb my friend
enjoy you D1

greg

 

Page processed in 0.032 seconds.