Simplest amp tube design? In SS, it's hands down the
174.22.4.52 |
||
| Posted on October 25, 2009 at 14:04:59 | ||
|
Posts: 26567
Location: Willamette Valley OR Joined: April 9, 2006 |
47 gaincard with its minimalist design, few parts, and ultra-short connections. Are there any tube-designers that have created products similarly with the "less is more" philosophy? |
|
RE: Simplest amp tube design? In SS, it's hands down the - casouza 20:05:57 10/28/09
(0)
Gordon Rankin's "Bugle" 45 SET amp has to be up there... - darkmoebius 22:53:09 10/25/09
(0)
47 gaincard - hardly the simplest SS design.... - AbeCollins 16:03:38 10/25/09
(6)
I think it is an LM3875, - rickmcinnis@dogwoodfabrics.com 12:22:01 10/26/09
(0)
He doesn't understand - E-Stat 12:21:26 10/26/09
(4)
You're befuddled by "simple." nt - tinear 20:38:17 10/28/09
(3)
Not in the least - E-Stat 20:45:23 10/28/09
(2)
You neglected to answer my quite simple question but to clarify my egregious sin (to you): - tinear 09:41:53 11/01/09
(1)
It all depends upon how you count parts - E-Stat 19:14:11 11/01/09
(0)
Bottlehead (nt) - Marc Bratton 15:44:20 10/25/09
(0)
|
| Gordon Rankin's "Bugle" 45 SET amp has to be up there..., posted on October 25, 2009 at 22:53:09 | |
|
Posts: 11762
Location: Los Angeles, California Joined: December 28, 2000 |
![]() Jeremy Epstein's "Free Lunch" (6C45pi/2A3) |
| You're befuddled by "simple." nt, posted on October 28, 2009 at 20:38:17 | |
|
Posts: 26567
Location: Willamette Valley OR Joined: April 9, 2006 |
f |
| Not in the least, posted on October 28, 2009 at 20:45:23 | |
|
Posts: 9840
Location: Central boonies Joined: May 12, 2000 Contributor Since: April 5, 2002 |
Can you count gain stages and semiconductors? rw |
| Bottlehead (nt), posted on October 25, 2009 at 15:44:20 | |
|
Posts: 4582
Joined: June 15, 2000 |
Don't think it gets too much simpler. |