|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
122.60.21.251
In Reply to: RE: Is there a stylus guide of "least damage" to vinyl? posted by goldenthal on September 27, 2016 at 01:22:32
The attractive feature of the MicroLine is the almost constant radius of curvature for the scanning surface as the tip wears. Additionally, the scanning radius is 3um (0.12mil) which puts it in amongst the tips which most closely resemble the cutting tip and provides the widest frequency response and least distortion especially on the inner grooves. The patent actually suggests an even smaller radius, but the limiting factor is the strength of the ridge - if the tip is damaged or chipped, the destruction of the groove is assured. Dynavector used to use the MicroRidge as well and Audio Technica continue to use it as does JICO for the "SAS" tipped styli.
My personal preference is for technical excellence and minimising wear, but I accept that euphonics are equally important for some people. For this reason, the Shibata tip has become popular again and is a surprisingly choice for premium cartridges such as the Ortofon "Black" series ahead of the lower models sporting more modern LC designs which I find curious! Audio Technica have followed suit by replacing the Microline on the 150 with a Shibata and also the AT33Sa. The Shibata is one of the first generation of LC tips developed in the early 70s. It is fundamentally flawed in that the contact line is curved not straight and this introduces distortion. However, the sound is apparently very appealing (according to reviews and marketing hyperbole) compared to the Microline. Each to their own!
Regards Anthony
"Beauty is Truth, Truth Beauty.." Keats
Follow Ups:
Flood2:
My limited experience tends to accord with your suggestion that Shibata produces h. f. distortion and does so even though the profile was devised to allow greater ease of tracking higher frequencies. In that sense, I have not found the few Shibatas of my (somewhat dated) experience to be "euphonic" -- i.e., the distortion did not add beauty.
Are MicroLine and MicroRidge the same thing?
Thanks,
Jeremy
Hi
MicroLine, SAS (Super Analogue Stylus as named by JICO) and MicroRidge are variations of the same basic design. There are subtle differences in the bearing radius and "ridge" thickness (the patent is fairly broad and specifies a wide range for the scanning dimension between 0.5um up to 15um - the lower limit being restricted by the mechanical strength of the ridge feature) and polish.
The Shure MicroRidge has a slightly larger scanning dimension of 0.15mil (3.8um) vs 0.12 mil for the MicroLine. The bearing radius is 3.0mil (76um) for the MicroRidge. The bearing dimension of the MicroLine is not disclosed in the specifications provided by AT but the range is typically between 70 to 80um.
The Shibata revival really puzzles me! The alignment of the tip is particularly tricky not just in use, but in manufacture - the contact line (curving aside) is not on the central axis line from the centre of the shank to the apex, it is slightly in advance (hence the curved line). Therefore the SRA is actually defined by the cut - one cannot use the USB microscope method which sets the shank/tip angle. I don't know how consistent the cuts can be made, but any lateral asymmetry will not only automatically introduce a zenith error, but potentially different effective rake angles in the channels. The "rake" angle of the tip itself in the cantilever can further introduce an error on top of this.
It is a very challenging tip to get to work optimally and it is readily beaten in technical capability by the more modern designs.
Regards Anthony
"Beauty is Truth, Truth Beauty.." Keats
nt.
Mark in NC
"The thought that life could be better is woven indelibly into our hearts and our brains" -Paul Simon
n
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: