|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.178.165.184
In Reply to: RE: Talk about dogma! posted by Curious on March 25, 2015 at 06:08:07
No matter where you stand, observer bias is a fact of life. None of us, neither self proclaimed "objectivist" nor "subjectivist", should claim to be free of it. Real "science" is based on this fact. Seems like you're arguing that you are more objective in your subjectivity than the other guy, totally free of preconceived notions or subconscious influences that affect your ultimate judgement. That's unlikely. You're human too. I agree the OP is more egregious in that regard, however.
Follow Ups:
I can't dismiss my ears. I've no doubt been impressed with the way some components have looked, and when they didn't deliver I probably felt more harsh towards them than I would toward something that looked bad and sounded bad. I'm not saying I'm special. And I think you said it well...I am a subjectivist who tries to be realistically objective about what I'm listening to. Tubes, Class A, Class D, Vinyl, Digital...I really don't give a shit necessarily. If it sounds awesome- sign me up! If it sounds bad, then go back to the drawing board and try again. Believe me, I'm rooting for you. The world needs more great 2 channel gear- not less.
"Hope is a good thing. Maybe, the best of things. And no good thing ever dies."
Your best quote (subjectively, to me) is, "Tubes, Class A, Class D, Vinyl, Digital...I really don't give a shit necessarily. If it sounds awesome- sign me up! If it sounds bad, then go back to the drawing board and try again."
This sums up EXACTLY the way I feel about audio in general.
To quote another, "I know what I like, and I like what I know..."
Cheers,
Dman
Analog Junkie
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: