|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.19.150.254
In Reply to: RE: Pardon me asking... posted by Dman on February 26, 2015 at 05:53:58
I think it was 200X. I used a microscope with a third ocular for the camera.
Follow Ups:
Actually, that microscope should be more than sufficient. However, you need dual fiber-optic lights to aim directly at the playing surfaces. You judge by the shape, size and clarity of the playing surface. It is best to have a new stylus to compare, which we always had in the store.
I have the right microscope, but I have yet to buy the lighting. It is expensive.
Dave
I actually bought the correct dual fiber optic light, but I have yet to take a picture of it. Yes, it was an expensive light and I hardly ever use the microscope anymore.
When I originally bought the microscope, I thought it would work as is because its built-light shines down through the objective lens. However it wasn't bright enough to light a stylus properly. I used flashlights for a while before finally giving in and buying a dual fiber optic light.
Thanks,
John Elison
...when funds permit (gotta get a new power amp first. Darned priorities)!
Cheers,
Dman
Analog Junkie
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: