|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
97.95.43.235
In Reply to: RE: How does the SA1000 compare to- posted by Ross on August 08, 2016 at 15:07:21
I would imagine quite favorably..The SA1000 ca be McShaned as well if you look at the power supply and I think another choke and and some tighter regulation on the G2 supply and this amp will run with the best of them.I am guessing because the Citation 2 and the Mc275 set the bar pretty high.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong" H. L. Mencken
Follow Ups:
affect sound quality to the extent that different amps sound more like each other than before the changes ?
Thanks,
Ross
Ross
The McShane changes bring out the potential design of each amp because you now have a power supply with a lower impedance and a lot of more joules of energy.This allows the famous circuits in the MACs,Citations,and Fishers to be able to operate at their full potential as dictated by the original design.Back in the day,it wasn't as big of an issue because you didn't have to worry about digital noise everywhere and the listening material of the day wasn't quite as dynamic or have the signal to noise ratios we have today.There was higher dynamic material but they didn't have the overall dynamic range of CDs and LPs that we have today.
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong" H. L. Mencken
I hated that tube in the Quicksilver monos way back. Glassy, brittle, unreliable.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: