|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
75.140.86.124
In Reply to: RE: Diane Krall's cover posted by Awe-d-o-file on June 11, 2016 at 08:01:07
Yeah, I know. But, that Krall version kinda killed the song, for me. So no matter what kinda stereo... what is on the turntable makes a difference.
It's just me.
8^)
Follow Ups:
I didnt think it was that bad. Vocals are only a part of the recording too. Are you an anti Krall? I own none of her albums and she is overvplayed by philes but Im not antiET
Edits: 06/11/16
But, if you are going to cover that song --- supremely done by Dusty --- better have something different going on in the new version. I mean the vocal AND the sax and trumpet soloes are outrageous in the 1967 song.Ok... ok... I have to admit I'm a Dusty Springfield fan. So, maybe I'm a little more critical of songs that cover her work.
8^)
Edits: 06/11/16 06/11/16
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: