|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.28.27.191
In Reply to: RE: Just a name; the Duplex is a coax two-way loudspeaker posted by mhardy6647 on March 25, 2016 at 06:19:53
Great info -wow ! And historically important -at the birth of the hi-fi era.
You're right about Altec in the 40s. But (I don't think) in kits until the 50s, along with Jensen, etc.
And I see they were not compression drivers. But still a lot more affordable than corner horns or ESLs, of the day..
Follow Ups:
As I understand it (and my understanding is meager), the 604 was, in essence, sort of a 515 LF unit and sort of a 288 HF unit in one package.
I love mine (604Es). Listening to "On Point" on FM radio via mine even as I type this, in fact.
all the best,
mrh
I see...
But not the typical horn driver -say a 1-2" dome handling the mid-frequencies.
Not sure we're on the same wavelength (pun partially intended).
The Duplex is a true two-way speaker, although most versions lack considerable HF extension due to the horn and the XO design. That's just one of those things. The diaphragm on the treble driver in a Duplex is fairly big; again, I think it's similar to (although not identical to) the famed, venerable (and EXPENSIVE) Altec 288 compression driver.
A dome MR per se would be far less sensitive than the woofer or HF driver used in the Duplex. The Duplex's HF driver and horn might be best thought of as a MR horn, but as you can tell from the XO frequencies (in the subject line, and from memory, so I may not be dead on the range used by all Duplex versions ever made/sold) much of the MR was handled by that big, 515-like 15" driver and its paper cone and pleated (accordion) surround.
I like to say that the Altec 604 series Duplexes are the best midrange drivers ever made :-)
Now, back to that crossover: Time alignment of the original Altec XO was, arguably, the big "opportunity for improvement" of the Duplexes of yore. Doug Sax "MasteringLabs" sold one that was widely used (and, IMO, quite effective) in studios.
Jeff Markwart has also designed improved XOs for some of the Duplex drivers. See link below.
all the best,
mrh
So we're talking a 6" compression driver ! Much larger than they use today. Back then, they used dynamic-cones (as compression-units) as well.
Then, the horn itself. Western Electric's 757-A, from the late 40s, didn't need to re-inforce its driver with 'butterflies' (like the RCA LC-1). Because it used an actual horn in its design.
Spec sheet for a more modern 288 below; VC is 2.8 inch; I presume the diaphragm is roughly the same (since they're basically a unit).
all the best,
mrh
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: