|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.141.96.215
In Reply to: RE: how about the "Five"? posted by gkargreen on February 15, 2016 at 13:28:36
Cit. 2 is better than the Cit. 5, which is not surprising, give the price differential. Still, the Cit. 5 is a superior implementation of Mullard style circuitry and worthy of considerable respect. Don't sneer at the Deuce's "little brother".
Eli D.
Follow Ups:
I do not agree the Citation 2 is better than the Citation 5. I have
two Citation 2's and one Citation 5. The five is much more "enjoyable"
on the ears.
Regards to all,
John
John
It's like Eli said,it depends what it's paired with..When the Deuce and the Mc275 came out,there fundamental purpose was one that could drive difficult loads like the KLH9s or Quad ESL63s.Synergy comes into play because the amps a very correct in their sonic nature as are the aforementioned speakers.On speakers that are more efficient and are a more stable impedance,the Citation 5 would probably do things more to your liking.
A friend you get for nothing,an enemy has to be bought
Speaker mating has much to do with where any particular preference lies.Over all, the "Deuce" is the better/more capable performer. However, the "Five" is 1 of the better "Golden Age" amps to pick for an acquisition/refurbishment project.
Eli D.
Edits: 02/15/16
restoration project!
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: