|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
73.226.116.199
In Reply to: RE: ADS/Dynaco Comparison posted by raymeedc on February 06, 2016 at 16:35:14
I'm using the Marantz PM8004 on a pair of Monitor Audio RX2's that go that low. So best guess - it should work???
I had a similar model Kenwood, the number I've long since forgotten? and it was tough as nails. So again it should not be a problem.
I had a McIntosh that would blow out if it had a low load.
The ADS's had a very JBL type sound. Bold and in your face. And I don't mean that in a bad way. I think that was because many of the models used multiple drivers and tweaked it towards a forward midrange.
Follow Ups:
That's what I'm looking for, something as highly representative/regarded/executed as the Dynacos for that East Coast Sound, but in the West Coast genre. Never had one of that ilk, I think I'd like a pair for variety.
I'm looking closest at the 500/520/570 series, as they seem to be closest to the Dynacos in dimension.
All this ADS talk lately has me looking for a pair.
I would like to find a larger 3 way floor stander.
Which of the bigger ADS were considered the most neutral?
Which were the friendliest to tube amps?
Thanks.
Meat; It's the right thing to do. Romans 14:2
I'd recommend anything in the L-series, particularly:
L-1290
L-1590
L-1230
L-1530
or possibly L-910.
later M-series were not nearly as good, and anything after that is not worth bothering with either (MV-40t, etc.)
I once regretted not stretching my budget back in '83 to buy the 1530s instead of the 1230s, which I still own. But not now, because the 1530s, while producing deeper bass and a wider sound stage, weighed over 100 (unwieldy come move time)pounds, and were really too big for the listening rooms I've had since the purchase.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: