|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
162.232.122.153
In Reply to: RE: 150 or 180 ohms posted by gkargreen on November 26, 2014 at 21:30:24
The Vampire 557 entry level male RCA's look like the ones I have. They fit the Scott, Sherwood and Mac C-22 just fine and I've never had a problem with them.
I also use the Canare F9's. They just make it without touching each other in the scott.
For phono with a cartridge that needs to see a low capacitance, like a total of 200pf for the best response curve, I use a 17 pf per ft very flexible coax that I got when I worked for an audio company but you won't find that on the market as it was made for them only.
I also have belden 9259 coax that's 17.3 pf per foot but it's not as felxible and If I remember correctly I had to buy a whole spool.
For a cartridge like some of the Shures that like around 400 pF, I prefer the Vampire wire that is now, as far as I can tell, only sold on E-Bay by a company in Gainsville Florida. It's CCR or CCR OFC and an E-bay search should bring that vendor up. They have premade cables too and I don't see why they wouldn't be good for high level interconnects as well even at around 60-70 pf per foot.
I personally seem to like the bare copper coaxs. Either stranded center conductor or solid wire center conductor.
Some people like the Mogami mic wire but using two center conductors and a braid around them means special attention to what end the braid is grouned at because it's just a shield and not a signal conductor. I believe the grouned end would be at the preamp to dump any hash/RFI the braid picked up.
Kind of funny that I don't go for the "cap breakin" thing but I'm fussy about how different wire sounds. Silver interconnects and litz speaker cable drives me nuts every time.
Having grown up with mono tube equipment then stereo, using lamp zip cord for speaker cable and never hearing about breakin or wondering what caps were in anything was glorious and so was the sound that I'm now used to and like so I'm more a best bang for the buck guy rather than "high end" that I could never listen too for very long.
Follow Ups:
thanks, Dave, your post is very informative! I too am a "bang for the buck" kinda guy, that is in part because I no longer have a job that is making money, and am back in school to get a job, or start up a new business doing electronics repair, so I am adding to my knowledge base by working on and learning from all the experts out here! I am currently using a Denon DL301 MkII cartridge, a LOMC, not sure that that will work directly into the Scott (or Sherwood when I get that one working...) but having the phono stage is a good option. And it is good to know that there are good quality plugs that will fit on those closely-spaced input jacks, thanks so much!
I think I found the Asylum around 2001 and reading about things people liked and didn't like was interesting and certainly food for thought.
Some of the suggestions I found to be things I liked and others weren't.
Having been around "high end audio" for many of my working years only reinforced my belief that I'm a late 50's to mid 60's tube equipment and speaker person.
If someone asks what I like or use I'll tell them but all that remains an opinion based on the way I like to hear music reproduced and how the combinations react in my system.
There's lots of wrong ways but only one right way. To have a system that draws you into the music and makes your feet tap.
Finding that combo is the hard part that can take you down many dead end paths.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: