|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
71.30.111.217
In Reply to: RE: Michael S., about your by-line..... posted by Jim McShane on March 02, 2014 at 10:47:29
I will be willing to bet that there is more to your home system sounding better than just being "faithful to the source". The quality of the reproducing system is a big factor too; ie car radio vs tricked out HK system.
The other thing is that the overall reason for listening to music is to enjoy it. I think that can best be done on a system that test instruments may not show as being as faithful in reproduction but my ears and common sense tell me is closer to the original SOUND and much more pleasant to listen too.
The simple fact is differnt people like different systems for different reasons and no one system or format will ever be right for everyone, and no one type is "better" than the other, just different. Which takes us full circle back to my origanl comment to Mike. Tha, tha, that's all folks!
Edits: 03/03/14 03/03/14 03/03/14Follow Ups:
Hi Vinnie,
It looks like we'll have to agree to disagree, but one last thought...
"I will be willing to bet that there is more to your home system sounding better than just being "faithful to the source". The quality of the reproducing system is a big factor too"
Actually no - my goal has always been fidelity. That's what drew me to the Citation amps years ago, and to hi-rez digital and top shelf analog. Excellent program material + excellent electronics + excellent transducers = excellent fidelity. At least to me (and the people who have heard my system)...
Thanks for the interchange of ideas my friend!
I agree to disagree. : )
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: