|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.197.4.8
In Reply to: RE: The would according the engineer Nelson Pass posted by Tweaker456 on October 05, 2016 at 14:58:11
"Well I disagree with the famed NP. Bigger is not always better. It's stupidly simplistic to make such statements. Have any of you heard of low powered single ended DHT amps? They are among the sweetest sounding amps around" My contention is that bigger is often if not exactly 100% always better for many situations. In reference to the comment about the sweet SE amps specifically I would contend that a bigger tranny with the same voltage and larger cap bank and fatter internal wires would improve the sound of that particular amp as long as it was done in a way that would not cause some other problem. Blow diodes, whatever. A bigger tranny with fatter wires... I stand by the principle of bigger tranny and larger cap bank. This as a general not stupidly simplistic statement in regards to this particular issue. Tweaker
Follow Ups:
I find the use of SET amps as an example poor. You need a better reference. I know they sound nice and lots of listeners love them. But they are inherently non-linear due to circuit topology(they compress the negative half of a signal compared to the positive half) meaning it can't be fixed.
Tweaker-
be cautious of all of this tranny talk...
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: