|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
96.25.74.167
In Reply to: RE: connecting audio gears directly to ac without plugs posted by ramw on April 19, 2015 at 03:22:45
"In conclusion, every bit of metal and contact after the meter counts."
So why don't the ones before the meter?
At the risk of stating the obvious wouldn't working on the PSRR of your system really be the logical approach? If all that incoming stuff matters you probably have a ground loop somewhere or poorly designed gear.
I've mulled it over in the past and decided that if I ever become insanely obsessive about the mains that I'd rig-up a motor/alternator in the garage and have a rubber "V" belt between my precious stereo and the philistine power company. Could that be your next step...
Rick
Follow Ups:
Joe Harley had the best word on the subject when asked the same question. He told the skeptic: "I have a money back guarantee, if you don't hear anything just return the cable."
Nuff said
But the problem is that you SHOULDN'T hear a difference, not that you do.
The power line looks horrible on a scope nowadays, way different than it did in the 50's when power factor was the main concern. If your gear isn't designed to reject those signals, and most aren't, then you got problems.
On top of that running unbalanced signals with grounded power cords is just asking for grief. Most of my stuff doesn't have "safety" grounds and that helps somewhat I think.
I've been tinkering with some resonance and Vib. issues of late and was blown away with the actual aural magnitude of the problem which I figured would be minor at worst. Perceptually it turned out to be anything but...
So far I have found little sensitivity to power supply issues but you know how it goes, you get one thing cleaned up a bit and as a reward you then hear the next layer of issues. Guess that's what makes it an 'interesting' hobby...
Regards, Rick
I'm finding that power factor correction even though an audio system is on the small scale of things, makes a difference.Even just using the .1 uF caps that are UL approved makes a difference. I initially though it merely shunting off noise, but I was informed by an EE that according to his measurements, it is affecting PF to a certain degree.
One of the things I have noticed is that running the snubbing circuits after the diodes, while making a sonic difference, ignores the spikes reflected back into the power transformer secondaries.
Since I use tubes, it is difficult to shunt the the B+ leads directly. Pondering the the reflection concept, I snubbed the other secondary outputs, namely the filaments (easy since they are low voltage). I was greatly rewarded by a much smoother and fuller sound. I was rather shocked at the amount of change and started to look at power transformers very differently.
Apparently the rectifier spikes go backward ( as was rather obvious) but can seriously contaminate the other secondaries. I have not really studied transformers, but it seems that such noise must be reflected and retained in at least the secondary windings.
We may be fighting more the effects rather than getting at the source of the issues in power transfer.
Of course YMMV and FWIW
Edits: 04/22/15
Hi Stu,
So before bridge and transformer you put a capacitor across + and -?
Did you try a RC across the + and - too?
The good thing in puting capacitor after the transformer is that you play with low voltage and so you can use other types of capacitors than X and Y ones. So you have to get the right value and you can play too around with the capacitor quality wich should be "earable" too. I think about very good and inexpensive russian teflons.
Well after transformer and before bridge. Hard to find high voltage AC caps for tube gear, so I place the caps, standard 120 VAC on the lower voltage secondaries like the heater taps. I make a bridge of .1 uF AC caps across both legs and ground.
works extremely well:eliminates high frequency edginess and brings out the midrange, lowering sn ratio and increasing dynamics. Oh and adds more detail
"So why don't the ones before the meter?"
Those are of a significance as well, But since I don't want to go to jail I do what I can within my territory.
Maybe you should have asked why people deal so much with outlets, plugs, cryo etc'. Power conditioners, stabilizers deal with the whole thing and that should be enough, is it not?
Screened PC's make sense though. So here comes the showerhead theory which I find to be true, otherwise I really can't explain what I am experiencing.
There are plenty of scientific evidence why current behaves like it does even thru the smallest of conductors and same gauges.
BTW there are some crazy videos online of people who installed their dedicated line straight from the neighborhoods transformer, Are they really crazy?
"At the risk of stating the obvious wouldn't working on the PSRR of your system really be the logical approach? If all that incoming stuff matters you probably have a ground loop somewhere or poorly designed gear."
No ground loop here, Trust me.
Most of the power filters I've tried harmed the sound, The ones I borrowed from my sound engineers friends were very good indeed but came with a price tag of $10k and higher.
" I've mulled it over in the past and decided that if I ever become insanely obsessive about the mains that I'd rig-up a motor/alternator in the garage and have a rubber "V" belt between my precious stereo and the philistine power company. Could that be your next step... "
Well, solar power comes to mind ;-) Anyho, I am fortunate to live in a place with a relatively new, clean and stable power supply so it would do for now.
went photo voltiac. Sells back 400 kW a month back to the utility company.
Says his systems sounds better on the PV grid with the oversized inverter he ordered, at lest during the days, on nights he is back on the grid
FWIW
My audiophile neighbor has photovoltaic cells on his roof, and he is fond of bragging to me that he loves to watch his meter run backward on a sunny day. But I got the impression that the way the cells are set up, the output is always going to the power company, day and night. Thus I would not have expected that the "quality" of the electricity used in a house bearing those cells is any different from what all the rest of us in the neighborhood are getting, regardless of sun exposure. This is in Maryland using PEPCO. Perhaps the way this is done is dependent upon locale and power company.
I've had a grid-tie system for the past four years. What your house does not use goes out to the grid. A special meter, (co-generation customer) supplied by the power company for solar installs records the kw, and yes they do go backwards. Each month my account is credited 22 1/2 cents for every kwh in excess of what I have used for that period.
Where I live the inverters feed the household circuit first and then the excess is sent to the utility. The meters still move backwards when that happens, however, be careful as some utilities use meters ( usually digital) which do not measure reverse flow.
Sells back 400 kW a month back to the utility company.
400 kW? That's a lot of PV cells. Do you mean 400 kWh?
D
YOu're right. all he mentioned was 400 kW but it must have been kW hours.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: