|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
96.61.75.215
In Reply to: RE: 47Labs FM Tuner posted by The Duke on August 26, 2014 at 08:57:05
It might sound great, but it's kind of hard to believe that, as a radio, its performance will be "high end" (sensitivity, selectivity, capture ratio, s/n)given its apparently rather modest hardware configuration.
That said, and all things considered, while it's not inexpensive, it's not ridiculously expensive, either -- given the likely very small production volume.
If 47Labs had a different design aesthetic, perhaps they would have done what Yamaha did with their CT-610II tuner (another three-gang FM tuner) ca. 1978 ;-)
Despite the rather cheezy design, the CT-610II actually sounds better than the average cheap/generic solid state FM tuner of its era. I certainly couldn't complain for $30 (purchased mostly to complement my CA-610II -- seemed somehow right to have the pair).
all the best,
mrh
Follow Ups:
This FM tuner seems to fit the bill rather nicely.
If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing well
(Proverb)
One of the best, if not the best tuner I ever owned. The 673 is not screaming expensive on the outside but the boys really knew how throw the parts into it and get it to perform. When I got mine the prices were still fairly low, low enough to buy just for that magnificent am tuner.
Don Brian Levy, J.D.
Toronto ON Canada
(top of the stack)
When it says "Philips Philips Philips" on the label, you will like it, like it, like it on your table, table, table (with apologies to the old Libbys' ad).
all the best,
mrh
(FINALLY found these scans!)
all the best,
mrh
Mine is still ticking after all these years. What I like about them besides being sounding neutral and true to the source, is the ability to pull signals anywhere cleanly and clearly as long as you give it the highest elevation that you can possibly attain.
Right now I'm only using a rabbit ears and I can listen to my favorite FM station at 300 km. away. Fortunately, I'm living in an area with an elevation of 3,000 ft. ASL.
If a thing's worth doing, it's worth doing well
(Proverb)
I have the same pair. Yeah the tuner does better than the guts suggest it would. The amp is just on the edge of making the grade for me but something about it continues to be bothersome. I have 2 of the amp's and neither get over the hump. I have been thinking about taking one and digging into it to see if I can kick it up a bit. I do not use the tone control and associated amp that has the bypass switch so just doing the other sections could make a difference.
The tuner sounds okay and as I listen to only a few locals not being a 5-ganger is fine. It does need bulbs throughout, though.
Don Brian Levy, J.D.
Toronto ON Canada
I don't find it hard to believe. That little Sony took the tuner world by storm a few years ago. It has RF specs as good, or better than my McIntosh MR-78. Sound quality is another matter though. Edit: I own the Sony XDRF1HD too, before anyone asks.The point is that tuner technology has come a long way, and you can get a lot of RF performance in a very small package.
I'm like you though. I still prefer a "full sized" tuner.
Edits: 08/30/14
... the 47 does. Three sections -- that's not a recipe for high performance .
all the best,
mrh
I hadn't given the variable capacitor much thought, admittedly, with regard to performance differences between the two.
I also agree with you regarding the point you make in another post in this thread, regarding some attention being paid to FM by a current manufacturer. It's nice to see.
Maybe not for dx'ing but a lot of very excellent sounding tuners including I think at the time all or almost all tube tuners use the 3-ganger. More is not necessarily "better". For instance with most tuners, the more I.F. stags usually detracts from the sound while adding to marketing driven specs.
Don Brian Levy, J.D.
Toronto ON Canada
You KNOW what I listen to...
all the best,
mrh
I have the same tuner and have to admit that it ain't all that bad but after opening it some time after my initial listening and seeing the guts, I got totally turned off. That thing is like a bully, all air. They could have at least mapped the pcb to fill the cabinet and spread the parts out to look like it was more than a pocket radio.
Their marketing group hit it right. Make it big, 2 meters, very smooth tuning, good feel of controls and make it look like a serious contender. Same for the matching 610II amp. In their defense, so far they have made every cut to downsize but only by the skin of their teeth. I have 2 of the amp's, 1 with some issues that likely will become an experimenter.
Don Brian Levy, J.D.
Toronto ON Canada
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: