|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
80.133.123.235
In Reply to: RE: so what's it have to do with 5814? posted by Tre' on July 11, 2015 at 08:04:13
timīs stats are hard to believe!
in the 12AU7 gain position of my gear i checked nearly every estimated "better" replacement you can imagine like 6067, 5965, 12BH7, E80CC etc. but i always swapped back to 12AU7/ECC82 (Siemens E82CC long plates currently) as it always performed better than all the others!
N.
The times, they are changing...
Follow Ups:
You don't think that's true?
Some further points?
i)If you didn't change the circuit values for each of those potential substitute tubes they wouldn't be operating properly, anyway.
ii) Unless the tubes you are rolling are the same design, the circuit values around that tube position will almost certainly need to change. And that's only if there's sufficient reserve heater current
iii) The 12BH7 shouldn't need any circuit value changes but will draw more current, and if it can't the sound isn't likely to be any good. In a circuit that has enough current any 'to spec' 12BH7 will beat any such 12AU7.
Warmest
Tim Bailey
Skeptical Measurer & Audio Scrounger
For me it's the RFT. The RFT is ruthlessly revealing and many would say cold, or hard sounding. And to some extent that criticism is true, but what we so often find when rolling tubes it's all about synergies. Nowadays, the only piece if gear I have left that uses a 12AU7 is my Primaluna CD player. The sound of the RFT when paired with the (I know, I'm starting to sound like the spokesman for them) JJ 5751 is just beautiful. That same RFT with just about any other AX7 type I own always ends up being just too much and gets rolled out.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: