|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
99.6.55.49
In Reply to: RE: JJ 5751 posted by Cory M. on July 05, 2015 at 10:17:30
Hey, Cory:
Hope you been well. I've been really impressed with JJ for a while now. Very happy with their 802s and 803s, the 5751 and the gold 6922s. They all sound way better to me in the CAT than any of their Russian counterparts. And at prices that are half to two-thirds the price of the Russians. In fact, I gave away all my Russian GLs, Mullards and TungSols to a buddy. I won't be using them anymore. Now if JJ just made a 6HB5 or 6GE5 I'd be in hog heaven. I plan to send the Acoustat servos back for more upgrades and mods soon. The offer still stands if you ever find yourself in DFW area with time to kill.
Mike
Follow Ups:
It'd be an absolute pleasure to listen to those Acoustats sometime. I've been curious as to what they sound like. I don't foresee myself in your area anytime soon, unfortunately, let alone being able to take a vacation at all. :-\
You were right, I jumped on the train of "better" MC's (no fault of yours, lol), the cantilever on the AT OC-9 somehow was missing one day when I went to play a record. My girlfriend pleads innocence. I also got an E.E. MiniMax phono stage awhile ago, which I find to be an amazing piece of equipment. It uses three 12AX7's, and so far the JJ has come out on top overall in the first gain stage.
Hey, the offer is valid for you as well, if you're ever out this way. I think that I've made some great strides, the system is tri-amped now, with a DEQX ( jaw- dropping transformation , IMO) and dual subs. The 'ol Counterpoints are still keeping up with it all. ;-)
Cory
Be interested in your long-term review of the JJ 5751. In my amps, the JJ sounds very good, initially. Quiet, good midrange. But as you continue to listen, the JJ 5751s seem to lack the headroom and perhaps harmonic richness of the US made 5751s. Specifically, the Raytheon blackplate 5751s and triple mica Sylvania tubes.
It is the best current 5751.
Don't necessarily disagree with you, but for a lot of us the 5751's you mentioned are near unobtainium, and if you do find good/quiet examples of them they can be quite expensive. These JJ's sound really good, and a certain internet retailer is currently offering them matched, balanced section, low noise and low microphonics selected for less than $20 each (shipping not included). For the kind of cost/performance ratio the JJ's deliver, it's a trade-off I'll make every single time. IMO, we, as tube enthusiasts, are lucky that JJ got it's act together after the quality issues they had a few years back.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: