|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
24.143.240.2
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: EL34 comparisons posted by Michael Samra on June 30, 2009 at 13:23:12
Every time I try a SED EL34 it just doesn't do it for me in either stereo or guitar applications. I like their 6L6GC though. For stereo I find the top end of it to be rolled off/recessed to a greater extent then I like. For guitar I find that it just doesn't have the magic. I like the Mullard XF2 much much more. It has a magical quality in a guitar amp and sounds more balanced for music when I tried em. The only tube I'd take over the Mullard for guitar without a 2nd thought is a brown based Tesla el34. Those are super nice. I never tried them with a stereo though.
"I find the top end of it to be rolled off/recessed to a greater extent then I like"
Danny,thats very possible..I find most all el34s rolled off on the top and shallow on the bass but this was only a couple amps that I compared them in and the ones I was using said Svetlana wing C and had black bases..I also used the wing C brown bases..I didnt say they were that great.What I did say was,I found them as good as any of my vintage mullards and better for detail..Maybe its just in the Leak or the lk150 scott so I cant be sure.I will do more testing.I just cant get el34s to work for me like the 6L6s do for audio..I know in guitar they can be desirable and I know many people like them but for my use,I cant seem to get them to perform like the Kt66s or EL37s or 6L6gcs.
If the power supply waveform isn't pretty,neither is the sound in most cases.
Post a Followup: