|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.87.139.175
In Reply to: RE: Morgan Jones is rather adamant about using Voltage Regs on B+ for that reason posted by Steve O on March 18, 2015 at 17:20:03
It's not all that practical in new designs either, unless you stay all class A, which sort of defeats the need in the first place.
The demands placed on such a regulator in a class ab amp are pretty nuts, but at the same time, a choke input filter will get you close.
Follow Ups:
Hello,
Can you elaborate on this?
My undertsanding might be wrong, but I always thought a class A amp was where there was the greatest benefits to have a regulated B+.
Since in class A the PS is in the signal loop, the lower Z it has, the better. Of course, as Steve posted below, the regulator's error amp is an other amp that follows the supplied stage's signal demand.
Thakns,
Joris
In a class A amp, provided the output transformer has sufficient inductance, you aren't going to see huge deviations in power supply demand.
If you have an AB push-pull amp, when you leave class A and move towards class B, the current draw from the power supply changes drastically. (Regulation helps here)
This isn't to say that a fully regulated class A amp is a bad thing, it's actually easier to do and will sound different, but it's not solving the obvious issue that class AB amps have.
I think a good case could be made that an active regulator is a feedback amp that has to operate down to DC with great stability compared to an audio amp that only has to run down to 10Hz or so. Regulating an amp's supply is sorta like cascading two amp systems.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: