|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
67.189.165.161
In Reply to: RE: The short answer as to way I like them... posted by Nickel Core on November 08, 2014 at 14:25:36
I have no problem with the concept that they sound better. I do have issues with the idea that they help grid current recovery since grid current is an AC phenomena which means that the inductance must also be considered.
dave
Follow Ups:
Did you every try to *add* a grid choke on top of an existing grid to ground resistor?
If it still sounds better, then grid current recovery is not the issue. It must be the higher reactance then (besides other phenomena I don't know about).
But the higher reactance won't make your frequency response more 'flat' if the response is already 'flat'.
NC
Never tried the series resistance but I do not like the parallel resistance since it sucks some of the life out.
this is an interesting comparison.... one trace is a undamped grid choke and the other is a 100K resistor. Source is a sine that transitions to some music. the output is simply the input signal subtracted from the signal reaching the grid of the 801.
Hi,
I tested the using the parallel resistor, only to find out that it *not* removed the low frequency oscillation :(
I changed back to a 43K series resistor, and again the oscillation was still there :( :(
The oscillation is on one channel only however, so maybe something else its wrong.
I listened quickly between the two options however. Using the series resistor, the presentation was more 'powerful'. There was more 'energy' in the presentation, however there was also a metallic 'glare' which was not present using the parallel resistor.
It was a quick listen only, but the presentation using the parallel resistor it was more natural and fluid, but lest dynamic and powerful.
Before I continue, i first need to get rid of the oscillation. No clue why that is there now...
NC
I'm going to try and interpret this (which you have done a dozen times already I guess).I'm just thinking out loud here...
Looking at your former graph, I conclude the blue line represents the result with the undamped grid choke not?
> the output is simply the input signal subtracted from the signal reaching the grid of the 801
So, the green trace still represents the input signal, the blue trace not. My conclusion would be that in the grid choke case 'more' of the signal reaches the grid, since no 'residual' signal is left if input and output are subtracted.
This is on par with the knowledge that when one uses a grid choke the gain is also higher (maximal).
A 100K resistor gives a fixed reactance on all frequencies, while the grid choke gives a much higher inductance (except for the lower frequencies, depending on inductance).
My guess is that if you simulate this using a higher value grid to ground resistor, the green trace signal will be smaller. When I find the time, i will do some simulations too.
When discussing grid-chokes and their low resistance to ground, I guess we are only worried about negative grid current. This should actually not be much of in issue in low mu tubes, and more of an issue in fixed bias cases than for auto bias.
The negative grid current is (mainly) caused by Gas Ionization, Ions hitting the grid will cause NEGATIVE grid current and the grid will take on a negative voltage from this current developing a potential across the grid to ground resistor. It seems clear then that a lower resistance from grid to ground, will cause a smaller voltage (error) to develop.
So, when bypassing a grid choke with a high value bypass resistor, I guess you can have your cake and it too. You maintain a low resistance path to ground, while create a higher reactance at low frequences. This at the loss of some gain, since the reactance of the grid choke will always be higher then the resistor at higher frequencies.
(Actually not so high. Reactance will exceed 350K at only 8Hz using a 7000H grid choke, so basically the resistance as seen by the grid is there as a result of the resistor, and not because of the grid choke. So basically the grid choke does nothing when bypassed, except providing a low DC path to ground).
The high inductance at low frequency (by using a high inductance grid choke), enables one to use a smaller coupling-cap, generally resulting in better results.
Of course the proof of the pudding is in the eating. I will implement the CL coupling of the VT25 as below, and listen to to results.
Edits: 11/10/14
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: