|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.213.216.95
In Reply to: RE: Actually............. posted by drlowmu on October 18, 2014 at 20:57:10
The emotional investment you've made is more than obvious. OK. When you calm down, you may remember that physics are involved. IF (huge IF) you exercised the same fervor applied to a different "favorite discovery of the moment" then you might have a new "favorite discovery of the moment".
Of course, none of this is any form of discovery whatsoever, as the 6AH4GT was designed and tested thoroughly, what, 50 years ago? As well as having been "processed" by the Japanese enthusiasts, what, 20 years ago ?
Again, OK fine. My suggestions were meant to remain in parallel with your wish for alternatives to the usual, while simultaneously showing more potential for measured performance. If this is an ugly offensive proposition from your POV, then it is. Why?, we can only guess.
Follow Ups:
we should all write on the chalkboard {100 times} before we commenced building our first amplifier..."A circuit with one tube type can be changed to sound like another tube by just changing its plate voltage, bias or load impedance. When a different tube is used, it’s different also. When changing operating points, many like tubes can sound exactly the same"Jeff, should have the eraser taken away and write a thousand times.
The Mind has No Firewall~ U.S. Army War College.
Edits: 10/19/14
What are you trying to say? What is your point ??
Jeff Medwin
You do realize who you're talking to, right? Scientific conceptualization is for suckers.
--------------------------
Buy Chinese. Bury freedom.
is a chore, but behind the facade, is what he believes are good intentions. I don't worry about that anymore.
It is his beliefs that don't have measurable proof, that are always the bone(s) of contention. I think we all have found evidence of unmeasurable "improvements". He may have "found" more than are easily believable. None of this is news.
His identification with Christopher Columbus however, does consistently fuel
equally exaggerated criticism. No news there either.
Worst part is when he sites physics as support for an argument, while moments later poo pooing another, who out does him with the same amo.
It's somehow worse than hypocrisy.
He doesn't play fair, yet he's not alone...
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: