 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
99.10.177.111
In Reply to: RE: PSUD is a tool... posted by xaudiomanx on March 08, 2011 at 14:04:48
A good stash of chokes, would mean the proper "H" based on the current it sees, as called for in the Hanna chart.
Mikey's signature line:" if the PS waveform.......
The power supply waveform is DC, which is a straight line. 0Hz, no waveform!
We can all agree to disagree if that's what it takes but the name calling is uncalled for.
Sometimes statements/claims are made without anything to back them up and defies logic.
"less is better" supply is the way to go if you can get it quiet.
Then it's not properly designed, passing ripple and causing other issues.
Follow Ups:
Wheezer,
Unless people read my full statements that you took quotes from, the context of what I am saying is missing. I think thew entire quote should be stated.
I remember Fox News did that to something Hilary Clinton stated and they left out some of the pertinence of the quotes so she would come out a loser on the issue. I heard the entire interview and although the Clintons or the Obamas aren't of my favorite to run a country, I did have to give her the benefit of the doubt because she was very articulate in what she was trying to get across.
I am not say that's what you are trying to do but if the entire quote isn't stated people can get that impression.
Paul
""I remember Fox News did that to something Hilary Clinton stated and they left out some of the pertinence of the quotes so she would come out a loser on the issue. I heard the entire interview and although the Clintons or the Obamas aren't of my favorite to run a country, I did have to give her the benefit of the doubt because she was very articulate in what she was trying to get across.""
Speaking of leaving out pertinent information to make Fox News look like they lack integrity, just what quotes did they leave out that made Hillary look like a loser on the issue?
Or I will start to tell you how I feel about Fox News and their ilk.
It's common knowledge that liberals and their ilk have little regard for the truth, so I would ask that you go back and carefully reread the xaudiom post and you'll see that he was the one that brought politics into the discussion, not me, so instead of chastising me get a clue and chastise the originator of the political rhetoric.
And by the way, liberals can't defend their deplorable ideology with sound reasoning and logic, so you don't even want to get into a discussion with me about Fox News and their ilk.
I hate to bother the moderator, but this subthread deserves to be terminated with extreme prejudice, as it were.
-Henry
I doubt the mods would feel inclined to act with such severity unless there are ad hominem attacks or other blatant rule violations.
IMHO, we've crossed the line on both counts. YMMV.
-Henry
Oh, I don't know. This forum is pretty mild compared with some others. Ever had a look at Critics' (Critters') Corner, for example?
Based on a brief email conversation I had with Mr. Diode, I don't expect the world would have much to lose if this topic were to continue without him.
-Henry
And that's what I wrote the first time.
It's a mystery to me why, when an individual brings partisan politics into a discussion like Xanaxmanx did, and somebody responds to it, the responder gets blamed for creating the problem.
It's really very simple... don't bring politics into the discussion in the first place and there won't be situations like this one.
Paul,
Good points you bring up. Plus, Mitch does not have a good grasp of the supply, so it is misinformation he spouts. Witness this diddy:
"Then it's not properly designed, passing ripple and causing other issues."
Q1) What exactly does "properly" designed mean?
Q2) EVERY supply passes ripple, the question is, how much is tolerable?
Q3) What other "issues" does Mitch perceive?
Q4) Does he understand that the supply is located throughout the amp, and the amp as a total entity must be looked at? NO, he certainly does not.
Jeff Medwin
Post a Followup:
| FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2013, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Take5 ]
