|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
74.74.162.231
In Reply to: RE: Its waterfall plot is quite expected posted by E-Stat on August 28, 2016 at 06:03:56
. . . . . . .
Follow Ups:
You are provided some latitude to vary the response to accommodate your room or specific recording content via controls on the backplate.
Lows and mids have a +3/-6 range while the top only offers attenuation. Mine remain flat.
Cool speaker!Does your room have much high frequency absorbers? The high knob appears to be at max.
Edits: 08/28/16
Does your room have much high frequency absorbers? The high knob is appears to be at max.
I use some diffusion. You can see pics in my gallery.
Once again, MAX=flat. Your only option is attenuation.
Beautiful speakers!
I also like the space and the bass traps behind those panel speakers.
I spent considerable time experimenting with speaker and bass trap position measuring the results each time to achieve the final room response.
An RTA plot would necessarily show more variation, but I find they sound quite neutral.
This post has been interesting to read. You have been very Kind E-Sat. I can't think of anyone I would rather have responding to this. My friend has a pair of Bose 901's too. He thought they were good. Until he tried a pair of real speakers. It is pretty obvious that the top end is lacking. I think of their accompanying equalizer as a box that is intended to make up for their weaknesses as performing some sort of "black magic"
It is pretty obvious that the top end is lacking.
Well, its there but as you say lacking in natural air and transparency to these ears.
as performing some sort of "black magic"
No *magic* - just addressing the inherent bandwidth limits of 4" drivers. Which works just fine at the bottom with wavelengths measured in feet.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: