|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
172.56.10.28
In Reply to: RE: Nice posted by spoutjack on July 17, 2016 at 12:31:22
Spout:
I wouldn't rule out JL, though I tend to prefer Rhythmik. JL is great stuff, but I don't think it offers the value proposition that RhythmiK does. At least IMHO.
Haven't heard the NOLA sub. I used to have a pair of the Boxers, and they were great speakers.
"Back home, when we get a taxidermy man, he gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him!"
--Robert Shaw, "Jaws," 1975
Follow Ups:
Thanks for the reply Quint. Quick question do the amps of the subs go bad really soon? I read on JL's website in one of the reviews that one of their customers amp failed within 6 months of purchase. Though its covered under the warranty makes me skeptical of the quality of the JLs.
I wouldnt worry about that but the Rhythmik prices are a lot better and the thirty day trial removes any risk.
ET
"If at first you don't succeed, keep on sucking till you do suck seed" - Curly Howard 1936
Spout:
It's always tough to gauge questions of reliability, but I will say this: My buddy's 113 failed within a year and a half. That's not to guarantee anything, but I thought I'd mention it. That said, my Rhythmik's amp failed within a year, but the company replaced it posthaste, and it's never had a problem since.
"Back home, when we get a taxidermy man, he gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him!"
--Robert Shaw, "Jaws," 1975
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: