|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.23.22.99
In Reply to: RE: because.... posted by Bob Neill on July 01, 2014 at 13:00:30
I read the first three or four paragraphs and it didn't appear to be going anywhere fast. Perhaps you can provide an inclination as to why you think it's worth reading.
Best regards,
John Elison
Follow Ups:
"Maggie 3.6 speakers cost five times what the sneaky-good small footprint Audience monitors cost. While there are differences in the presentation each makes, the truth of our mutual experience was that EACH was splendid; BOTH were vibrant, accurate and sonically engaging. A discerning listener might prefer one over the other, but no one I've given an audition of the "One" pair has offered anything less than surprise, pleasure, and a degree of outright amazement that such a small speaker can create such three-dimensional power, musical richness and dynamic complexity."
That, my admiration for Audience and John McDonald, and the price.
Ah, yes. It's a pleasure to own exceptional speakers. I love mine, too.
Thanks,
John Elison
Yes, It was going, and it went nowhere fast...
the superlatives are at odds with the definitions and the concepts of this hobby.
I say that because there is no context as to where and how they were used.
As headphones? Then I do believe the review....as headphones.... as desktop ??? Monitors? What is the meaning of monitors? missing two lowest and a some of the upper ocatve?
accurate, power, palpability.... really?
what is that? a 3" driver? I have yet to find any driver who managed to circumvent physics.
sorry, making dinner. forgive the typos and rant
It doesn't circumvent physics.
Even with 12mm of excursion and a $9 Peerless passive radiator it runs out of puff at 91dBspl max.
Overpriced tosh.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: