|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
12.189.30.98
Hola,
Anyone buy a pair or hear the Arabesques? (link below)
I think that they look really cool, - but wouldn't go well with my old-school, Mexican Colonel furniture and 1910 bay window SF apartment. But do think that they look pretty cool, - especially if one has the "vibe" and decor to match. I bet that many of us place more emphasis on looks than we sometimes admit. But, in a lot of ways, when you pile up all of the sources, amps, power products, and cables: (and now computers, and interface boxes), and have all of the other products besides speakers sucking up precious room space; what becomes more aesthetically objectionable?
I also thought that the O'Hoecha robot speakers were pretty cool too, - but one really needed a George Jetson apartment to fit those in. Everytime I heard the O'Hoecha I really liked them and thought that they cast an amazing soundstage, - but after awhile, - they became quite fatiguing.
There are no more humans
Finally, robotic beings rule the world
The humans are dead
However, for the money...not sure that they are good value.
. . . I see some real pluses. SWEET drivers -- top line ScanSpeak woofers and a Raal true ribbon tweeter. Clever internal cross-section, with no parallel surfaces, and sort of a short tapered line leading to the slot vent on the back. Narrow enough front baffle, with chamfered adjacent sides, which should result in a fairly benign diffraction profile. (Since they don't call these a 2.5 way, I assume that the three woofers are in parallel to gain efficiency, and that the lowpass filter includes appropriate shelving for baffle step compensation). Never having worked with glass as a cabinet material, I'm not familiar with its resonant properties -- maybe, in a design like this, it is in fact superior to plywood or MDF.
But I would still be concerned about undamped organ-pipe resonances in the vertical dimension. Having built several tall narrow cabinets myself,I don't see how these resonances could NOT color the sound. It usually takes a fair amount of wadding crammed into the lower part of the cabinet to damp them out.
And I REALLY wonder why they put so much distance between the tweeter and the upper woofer. Closer is always better, and less than one wavelength at crossover frequency is nearly universal practice these days. Whatever the crossover design (they say 2nd order electrical/3rd order acoustic at 2kHz), that much separation will lead to serious lobing issues on the vertical axis -- ESPECIALLY with a rectangular ribbon tweeter, which has wide horizontal dispersion but almost no vertical dispersion more than a few degrees off axis.
I'd like to see a comprehensive review of these, with a full suite of measurements. Hello, JA?
they look like sh**. Don't do anything for me. Would never consider having them in my home.
Agreed. They remind me of a shower stall...
I think Kal has hit on something...
these are "clearly" designed for tweakers; for warmer sound use tropical species, for cooler sound Icelandic Cod is best.
I can just see it now, a disco ball in the works for '70s AOR and a miniature candelabra for the barocque.
At least the industrial designers kicked off the GM Aztek project are still getting work. Who buys this mawkish Kak anyhow?
There is an extremely positive review in the September issue of HIFI+ magazine.
Jim
I see a few IMMEDIATE problems with those things.
Those long, unbraced glass panels will ring audibly. Being of several differend widths, they will ring at several different frequencies, adding colorations or distortions at those frequencies to the direct output of the drivers.
The hard, slick baffle will be highly reflective at higher frequencies, leading to audible diffraction issues. I can already hear these, in my mind's ear, sounding "hard," "glassy," and "glary." Jim G. could whip up some nice felt baffle pads for 'em that would alleviate the problem somewhat, but of course that would compromise the "looks."
What about internal reflections and resonances? There is NO internal lining of acoustic foam or felt, and NO stuffing of Dacron, fiberglass, wool, etc. (which would ruin the "looks"). The irregular internal shape will mitigate standing waves somewhat, but the long tall column (regardless of cross-sectional shape) will still have an "organ pipe" resonance, and undamped reflections will still hit the back of the woofer cones, albeit at a greater multitude of angles and frequencies than would be the case with a rectangular cabinet.
Let us assume that the drivers are of the highest quality (sorry, I don't recognize 'em offhand, but that ribbon tweet looks nice), and that the crossover was well designed by a competent EE. The cabinet problems, noted above, will still seriously compromise performance.
did you hear them?
And really, no offense, - but, - one can't predict or speculate on how a speaker sounds until we listen to it.
Not that what you say doesn't have validity; but, I've been surprised before. And, we need to listen to validate those observations.
There are no more humans
Finally, robotic beings rule the world
The humans are dead
to spot bad engineering that will lead to known anomalies. I'm less concerned with the glass resonances, and different panel sizes is a plus, I'll always take multiple lower-level resonances to a single 'summed' resonance.
But the top to bottom mode will be brutal in those.
Bass is supposed to sound big. 6.5" is not a woofer size.
When I heard them, at CES, I was impressed with the sound. I also found that I could not detect much in the way of panel vibrations, less than most woodish cabinets. What I do not care for is the appearance. I could not figure out how to get the water and the fish in! ;-)
a speaker affect our aesthetic impressions. And, - is it a guy thing?
When something looks like it does, it's hard not to characterize it as a novelty. If it sounds good, and people think that it looks really cool, - it's going to generate some sales. People are definitely going to hate it because of the looks. IMO, - something like the Phoenix speakers are far worse, and absolutely horrible. But, there are others who may think that they look really cool.
There are no more humans
Finally, robotic beings rule the world
The humans are dead
sometimes there can be too much of a good thing. I do find this speaker and many others to be visually striking. However, putting multiples of them in a room is overwhelming. For example, I cannot imagine being comfortable with 2 or, in my case, 5 of them.
Kal
A friend of mine really liked it and almost bought one. However, the price asked for puts it in the territory of a lot of top end and more "proven" designs, often with fancier components and bigger scale (Avalon, Marten, Wilson, etc.) and likely better resale value. He was also worried about the interior of the thing getting dirty over time (the box is not a sealed design). Apparently, the distributor here sees a lot of interests but hardly (if at all) end up selling any.
Man,
Totally true. Those things would look horrible if there was even the slightest bit of dirt. That whole hi-tech, modern-art, impression would be ruined with things like dust, dirt, cat hair, or fingerprints.
There are no more humans
Finally, robotic beings rule the world
The humans are dead
Post a Followup:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
[ Go Green ]
[ Take5 ]