|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
212.42.175.73
In Reply to: RE: Rear Firing Ports & Placement posted by theaudiohobby on November 21, 2007 at 04:42:48
Dear TAH,
From my recollection it was not I who made the unsolicited claim about rear ported designs' it was you, so why don't we start by you providing the required references as to why rear ported designs have more room problems and other acoustic ill effects and spend some time analysing that material first, we can then move on to related matters.
I am perfectly happy to provide material to prove my end of the discussion once I have had an opportunity to see the material that backs up your claim.
Sincerely,
Peter Qvortrup
Follow Ups:
I should have guessed....just another day on the salesman trail...here was I thinking that you will use the opportunity to provide some clarification.Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
Wait you said this:
"but it comes at significant price, the speaker is much more placement sensitive with the associated ill-effects."
I have never heard this from any source except you. Why is it so hard for you ONCE to simply state a book and a page number where you got this information from? You stated it BEFORE Peter made a post.
You made a CLAIM FIRST
He said he would give you the information IF you could simply back up your claim. You are clearly the one weaseling out of it and the fact that the other poster is a manufacturer does not change anything.
You made a claim that should be very easy to back up since apparently you are an acoustics engineer wannabe so why is it so hard now.
I mean I asked you to show me how a horn speaker and a panel were more the same than they were different -- surely you could back up that claim with references but alas BS as usual.
Dear TAH,
Guess what, you are just another arm chair general with no army.
When you make a claim for which there appears to be little or no justification the burden is on you to bring something to the table that backs up what you say, so how about bucking up and backing your negative comments and claim about rear ported designs up, rather than, as usual when challenged, trying to take the fight to someone else's yard to divert attention to the fact that you have nothing by way of support for what you say?
TAH, we have been here before and this is your standard tactic, you make some unsolicited claim negating some aspect of a design, but without even the slightest scrap of evidence to back up what you say, and then you expect me or someone else to take what you say serious?
Sincerely,
Peter Qvortrup
We were actually having an intelligent discussion until joined the thread to offer a sales pitch.
Music making the painting, recording it the photograph
Okay you have now made another claim.
Please show the sale's pitch?
You slag a design with zero evidence but he's at fault and making a sales pitch. What weird little lonely life are you living.
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: