|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
108.20.149.92
In Reply to: RE: Who thinks SS systems are generally more "truthful" than SET systems posted by Frihed89 on March 30, 2015 at 12:57:31
Given all of the mixing and post production stuff that goes on during the sausage making of a recording, what "truth" could there possibly be?
All that matters is that the customer for that art enjoys it during its consumption.
Follow Ups:
I have a copy of Sheffield Labs Adam Makowicz. It was recorded with a single point stereo tube microphone. There was no mixing or sausage making.That recording contains a lot of "truth".
Furthermore, it is my belief that a system that gets this type of recording right will get all types of recording right and the listener will appreciate it given the opportunity (that is to say, the listener needs to educate himself first as to what real acoustic instruments sound like by seeking out live performances of unamplified acoustic music).
I know that most people say this hobby is totally 100% subjective.....but it's not!
Tre'
Have Fun and Enjoy the Music
"Still Working the Problem"
Edits: 03/31/15
It is also why for some years I was making my own recordings of classical performances...some in my own apartment and some in a small concert hall. Always with either a stereo pair in Blumlein configuration or mono (better actually with a solo violin).
I also have a very good orchestral recording that was made without trickery and using only a Stereo ribbon microphone...that is a true test of a system I tell you.
That which you just typed is truth. It may sound elitist, but it is factual. This is why I conducted tests of lses using a recording that I personally made and concluded it acts like a dynamic expander.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: