• Re: RPG 4"Bad panel vs ethans panel trap - Ethan Winer 10:47:08 03/02/06 (0)
  In Reply to: Re: RPG 4"Bad panel vs ethans panel trap posted by Valentin Rivero on March 1, 2006 at 18:47:44:

  Valentin,

  > in this case 4" bad panel would provide more absotion in bass and mid area. <

  It depends on how it's mounted.

  > I plan to build these panels do you think the fiber should touch the panel like the original or if i leave some space could help absortion in the bass(would it be a helmuzt in a way) it would have a frame <

  Build which, membrane traps from my plans or a knock-off off the RPG panel? If you build from my plans there has to be a space. If you mean a BAD panel, I've never seen one so I don't know what's in it besides rigid fiberglass.

  --Ethan
  
  

  ---
• Sorry - Kal Rubinson 09:17:57 03/02/06 (0)
  In Reply to: Re: RPG 4"Bad panel vs ethans panel trap posted by Valentin Rivero on March 1, 2006 at 18:47:44:

  Both links compare BAD panels of 1",2",3" and 4" thickness with Fiberglass of 1" thickness and that is what I think is misleading. The difference between the BAD panel and FG is in the 1KHz and up range as the low end is the responsibility of the FG in each.

  Kal
  
  

  ---

This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:

Kimber Kable

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---