|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
12.189.30.98
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: You are not dealing with correlation or causation, unless you have an underlying idea that more expensive is posted by Norm on June 26, 2009 at 13:31:13
Depending on how you conduct your testing, how thorough and rigorous you are, - your hypothesis and conclusions may vary. And some may call your testing methodolgy "poor science," - but it's still science. I have take issue with the neither those that that want more rigor or less; but, - I always appreciate tolerance for both sides.
Both sides of the river, there is bacteria; there must be meaning behind the moaning, is this living?
minded. When engage in information gathering to assess regularities of some benefit to society, I insisted on valid measurement of concepts, random samples, careful methodology, and care to avoid spurious relationships, when you cannot do real experiments. How I would love to randomly pick 25 states to have concealed handgun laws and 25 none and wait 20 years to see what differences there are between the states. My null hypothesis would, of course, be no differences.
Post a Followup: