 
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
|
|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
In Reply to: Cubase vs. Nuendo posted by Micah on October 08, 2002 at 21:32:17:
Cubase originally was a MIDI-only sequencing program, very popular in the UK & Europe, where 'cracked' (dongle-less) copies would run on an Atari Mega-4 computer without additional hardware. -The high cost of Apple computers over there made the vastly superior 'Performer' software virtually unknown.Both are from Steinberg, but Cubase mutated into cubase audio when Digital performer was released. -Both were midi sequencers, with nonlinear audio tracks tacked on as an afterthought.
Nuendo is a ground-up audio program. It's the way to go. -No idea where you got the advice that Cubase is better for audio, I know bunches of people who work in top-drawer studio facilities who use Nuendo, and not one single person who uses Cubase for audio.
Keith A.
Follow Ups:
Re-reading my last post, I should make clear that I meant Cubase and Nuendo are both from Steinberg, it might have been taken to mean that cubase and Performer were both from Steinberg.Keith.
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors:
Top of Page ]
[ Contact Us ]
[ Support/Wish List ]
[ Copyright © 2025, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ]
