|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
97.89.27.103
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: Windows 7/J.River Media 14 posted by Mercman on November 06, 2009 at 08:54:04
Sounds good to me too!
JR 14 works great for me except for some reason my TV card won't work anymore...bummer.
Did I mention it was yours truly who convinced them to make a WASAPI plugin...
I tried to get them to make a version that was lighter on resources [just for audio] with the reasoning it might improve sound even further, but was shot down rather quickly by JR groupies.
JR is a great product, I also figured if they were to sell it as a basic audio product only at a lower price and offer the other features at a minimal cost it might be more accessible to a wider group of people...and at the same time give them a metric to measure which features are truly value added [measured by sales]. Many businesses use this approach with various products, its nothing new.
Anyways, yes it does sound good and its also a good practice to re-visit and keep experimenting with different player once in a while...small changes on the software end can make a big difference in some systems.
Scrutiny Strengthens The Truth and Breaks Down Lies 音楽は天国と地球のかけ橋
> > JR is a great product, I also figured if they were to sell it as a basic audio product only at a lower price and offer the other features at a minimal cost it might be more accessible to a wider group of people < <
See link below. The only audio features missing from the free version are WASAPI and multiple libraries. I have only tried Vista briefly, but preferred kernel streaming via ASIO4ALL, which does work with both the free version of J.River and Vista.
It's been several months now, but as I recall the sound between ASIO4ALL and WASAPI were identical but with ASIO4ALL the sample rate changes were automatic, while WASAPI (like the QuickTime engine that runs iTunes) requires manual sample rate changes.
Feel free to correct me if my memories are wrong.
Yes I am aware of Jukebox, basically it is similar to what I was talking about except for the lack of WASAPI and other aspects that certain software players addressed to obtain superior sound. Speaking of the work done by Cics, XXHighend and Amarra for example...getting deeper into the Kernel of an OS and workings of processors to get the maximum potential. JR has some very good code writers, they made the WASAPI plugin in less than a week [from idea to user ready]. I am sure they can give other High-End audio software's a run for the money. If they can make a product that sounds that good aiming for the average Joe, just think what they can do if they really tried...
If you can not hear a difference between WASAPI and ASIO I won't argue that, but I can and so can others....Maybe if you listened with a pair of Dynaudio's the difference would be clearer ~wink~
At the time WASAPI needed a little tweaking to get it to work correctly, namely with the buffer.
![]()
Scrutiny Strengthens The Truth and Breaks Down Lies 音楽は天国と地球のかけ橋
"Did I mention it was yours truly who convinced them to make a WASAPI plugin..."
Good job DR!
Post a Followup: