|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
24.7.103.234
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: Upsampling in cPlay posted by tsearay on October 20, 2009 at 18:10:09
AH. You dont output higher than 96k on the Lynx.The Juli@ though can do 192.
And have you tried the analog outs of your lynx? That WILL handle 192k.
Edits: 10/20/09
What leads you to say this? My lynx aes shows an output setting of single wire 192 as well as dual wire 192. I have no way to test it presently, but it appears it is in its ken.
Yeah, for the AES, but we are talking about the L22.
Look at the spec sheet for the AES 16 it DOES have support for 192, but not the L22. Look under Digital I/O in the lynxs ( :) )below
http://www.lynxstudio.com/pop/product_file.asp?i=25
and for the l22
http://www.lynxstudio.com/pop/product_file.asp?i=24
Your right, I missed which Lynx you were talking about and hadn't realized they differed in this respect.
I wasn't sure myself!
Looks like the 16 came later and supports 192. Thats a great thing for those who have the cards.
Ah! Thank you! you are correct the digital out on the Lynx is limited to 96. I have tried the balanced out but prefer the digital to DAC. I have been struggling with "to upsample or not to upsample" to the dac, myself. I get a lower latency at 96 than 41 but really hard to tell if there is a benefit in SQ. AES/XLR throughput to balanced amplification. T.
No worries!
Post a Followup: