Computer Audio Asylum

Posted by DHT 4 ME (A) on May 30, 2009 at 16:34:33

In Reply to: RE: the dubious pleasures of resampling posted by steppe on May 30, 2009 at 13:21:27

I am a graphics pro also.I agree with your assessment however I combat the fuzzy uprezzing by grossly over rezzing and then downsampling.
It is the equivalent of sampling to 352.8 then do a DC offset and downsample to 192.
Of course this is in Photoshop and I have no way of doing it for audio.
Just and interesting idea
Bob
www.PlateauLight.com

• RE: Photoshop analogy - kalimasada 21:22:15 05/30/09 (0)
  In Reply to: RE: Photoshop analogy posted by DHT 4 ME on May 30, 2009 at 16:34:33

  Yep, I agree, by upsampling to 400% and then viewing the result in 25% image size, Serge has in fact do two resampling processes. I can usually accept images downsampled using Photoshop internal function, but for upsampling I prefer it done with external plugin such as Genuine Fractal Print Pro. I prefer editing wave file with Wavelab software, but for upsampling, I prefer SRC.
  
  Sopian
  
  

  ---

Post a Followup:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Computer Audio Asylum ]
[ Comment ] [ Edit ] [ Delete ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Go Green ] [ Take5 ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---