|
Home
/ FAQ
/ News Classifieds / Events |
Audio Asylum Thread Printer |
Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
119.236.31.63
| '); } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } else { document.writeln(''); } } // End --> |
In Reply to: RE: cPlay 2.0b26 Released posted by cics on May 28, 2009 at 01:45:15
I just compare SoX VHQ Linear 99 vs Izotope, 44.1 -> 192, and I feel that SOX online upsample is better than Izotope offline upsample. SoX has lower distortion and background is quieter. So I get a better imaging and resolution is higher. I use Lynx aes16e->Mytek 8x192-> Beyer 990. Result is the same when I switch to Chord+MUBE.
My perception has always been that online upsample cannot beat offline... so I will try a more days. If SOX is confirmed successful then I can delete all the 192 up-sampled wave files (300MB+ each). SoX is not a CPU hog. My E7200 runs SoX without pops and clicks at 800Mhz (Asus P5KPL-CM) and heat sink is cold as room temperature.
Otherwise b26 sounds just as musical as previous versions. I guess this is the result of good ASIO integration.
Gee I thought B25 could not be improved!
Just received an email from a cMP² user on a similar experience as yours, i.e. Online betters Offline.
Which filter do you use with Isotope?
Sorry ackcheng I need to tell you later... My main PC just doesn't boot anymore after I insert the E7400 :( I need to fix it...
Post a Followup: