Computer Audio Asylum

Posted by ob2 on May 29, 2009 at 00:59:04

In Reply to: RE: cPlay 2.0b26 Released posted by cics on May 28, 2009 at 01:45:15

With SOX, how the sample rate conversion is performed?

Is it done on the fly?
Or is it first complete the conversion and then play?

I think it may sound better if it is first converted to the target sampling rate before it is loaded to the memory and play.

Thank you.

• SoX resampling is done in realtime (and not during RAM load) - cics 09:57:29 05/29/09 (0)
  In Reply to: RE: cPlay 2.0b26 Released posted by ob2 on May 29, 2009 at 00:59:04

  Given that there's less RAM processing with realtime upsampling, it would be better. It would be interesting to compare batch converted SoX file vs realtime upsampling.
  
  

  ---
• RE: cPlay 2.0b26 Released - ob2 01:02:10 05/29/09 (1)
  In Reply to: RE: cPlay 2.0b26 Released posted by ob2 on May 29, 2009 at 00:59:04

  How good is SOX? How SOX compare to leading sample rate conversion software such as SARACON by Weiss if I use it to upsample from 44.1kHz to 96kHz?
  
  

  ---

  • RE: cPlay 2.0b26 Released - artcheng@netvigator.coma 04:57:34 05/29/09 (0)
    In Reply to: RE: cPlay 2.0b26 Released posted by ob2 on May 29, 2009 at 01:02:10

    The SNR is one of the best. SARACON uses linear phase filter which SOX allows. If you look at the comparison site, SARACON is not that good afterall
    
    

    ---

Post a Followup:

---

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] Thread: [ Display  All  Email ] [ Computer Audio Asylum ]
[ Comment ] [ Copyright Warning! Click for Details ]

---

[ Top of Page ] [ Contact Us ] [ Support/Wish List ] [ Copyright © 2009, Audio Asylum, all rights reserved ] [ Go Green ] [ Take5 ]

---

[ General ] [ Speakers ] [ Tubes ] [ Vinyl ] [ Digital ] [ Hi-Rez ] [ Video Asylum ] [ Cables ] [ Tweaks/DIY ] [ Music ] [ Films ]

---