|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
93.109.86.64
In Reply to: RE: Try these Audio Registry Changes in Windows posted by SBGK on January 04, 2017 at 04:52:07
what the 'best' settings are. The SQ also varies with the particular OS used ie 8.1, 7 or Server (2008 to 2012R2).
Changing the various settings and observing the changes in SQ just goes to show that there is no such scenario as a universally best set of settings. Most of us cannot deal clearly with 7 factorial combinations, let alone the many combinations of settings under 'audio' and 'pro audio'. Thus the claim of a universally applicable optimal setting seems bogus.
Below there is a post claiming that the poster has an 'optimised' high power system playing FLAC!
For what it is worth, I find the best SQ with changes to the 'Audio' registry alone whereas there is good balance between clarity and bass quality, even playing 176/192/352k files. This is for one system only and likely to change with others. I prefer engaging MMCSS on this system.
Follow Ups:
"Below there is a post claiming that the poster has an 'optimised' high power system playing FLAC!"
Quit spreading misinformation based on your misunderstanding. He is not "playing" FLAC. His server is 'streaming' FLAC to a dedicated network streamer. Pay attention.
with reading retention and the ability to answer simple questions.
What is high powered is the i7-860 server. Using Cray 2 computational power to decompress FLAC files is quite sufficient.
His server is 'streaming' FLAC to a dedicated network streamer
Actually, what gets sent to and *played* by the streamers are WAV files. But then, such concepts are beyond his level of understanding.
So what? Why is his system 'optimised'? Or are you so claiming? Then say why.
The end-point is optimized for dedicated music playback.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: