|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
194.126.37.40
In Reply to: RE: "What does any of that have to do with musical enjoyment?" posted by genungo on January 24, 2016 at 10:40:57
Initial care in recording and mastering have a far, far greater impact.
Do you think 192 Khz/24 bit has 4.x times more "resolution" and "detail" than a 44.1 Khz/16 bit?
Follow Ups:
Each time you add a bit, you double the resolution! ;-)
It sure doesn't sound that way. How are you measuring resolution?
Alan
Which, with the right equipment, can be resolved with that 24th bit, or with just ONE bit at 2.8224 MHz sampling rate.
Broke my heart when she passed away. :-(
There's a school of thought that asserts that going from 16 bits to 24 bits makes WAY more audible difference than increasing the sampling rate from, say, 48K to 96K. I've heard some incredibly great recordings at 24/48, and I'm not sure I would disagree with that assertion.
Cannot answer that question at this point in time because I've got some more listening to do.
MAYBE, "Only the jaw knows for sure"?
Haha. I like that one. Let us know how your jaw endures....
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: