|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
96.224.88.244
In Reply to: RE: Ars Technica dissects an AudioQuest Vodka ethernet cable posted by Sprezza Tura on July 24, 2015 at 09:44:00
"But to be clear, the technical benefits of Cat7 are there...superior noise rejection, higher bandwidth and much better connectors."
True, and I have found them an improvement most likely due to the shielding. I use good CAT7 for audio, not boutique ones.
Follow Ups:
As I have posted before, Rosewill, at a buck a foot, is all you will ever need unless you are a NASA rocket scientist.
I see the part time guy got his stuff deleted. lol
Yes, it seems so. Ran to his mommy?
Your assessment of his so called review was spot on. This type of fictional nonsense must be called out.
Yes... There is no way a network could perform as badly as he initially claims unless the cables were wrapped around fluorescent lights!
It's hilarious his network has dropouts and glitches and then the HQ cables ride in on a white horse to save the day. LOL
The funniest part is he claims to be an "IT professional" yet still had the gaul to publish such crap.
Edits: 07/25/15
yes, and his assertion that there was a colossal difference between networked and locally stored files shows his knowledge of how to set up a computer audio system is non existent.
Having read some of his other computer audio related reviews, this is obvious.
I posted something over on Critics. What do you think?
Edits: 07/25/15
Nice! i will comment.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: