|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
76.220.25.80
In Reply to: RE: 90ohm impedance posted by Ryelands on July 21, 2015 at 06:58:43
If a cable doesn't meet that 'standard', whatever that is, it's NOT a 'USB' cable and should not be sold as such even if it to appears to function.
Link below:
Follow Ups:
If a cable doesn't meet that 'standard', whatever that is, it's NOT a 'USB' cable and should not be sold as such even if it to appears to function.
Thank you. I have copies of nearly all the pertinent paperwork and have even read some of it (that sad) but I'm sure you'll understand that, if the relevant standards boards don't feel the need to police the use of their logos, neither do I. TBH, if a £1.50 USB cable works, I give not a hoot whether or not it's entitled to carry the logo.
It was our rather arcane little niche - USB for high-end audio - I was concerned with. Specs in this sector are a different matter and concern the real world of valid claims and engineering tolerances.
It may be a matter of the 11th commandment.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
Then it appears you DO agree with Tony after all when he states: "Indeed, if a cable is sold as a "USB cable" it had better be 90 ohms, otherwise it is defective or fraudulent."
Then it appears you DO agree with Tony . . .
As I said above, I have no opinion on the subject. As he is wont to do, Tony seems to be back-tracking from one of his typically OTT pronouncements with a blast of techno-guff. Make of it as you will.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: