|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
50.159.77.150
In Reply to: RE: Tony thanks! posted by Tony Lauck on May 04, 2015 at 10:08:45
"I don't see wireless replacing cables for anything that is too big to be portable. For my entire life I have yet to see any radio system that provided the consistency and reliability of wired communication."
Not to mention best pings, bandwidth. I hope wired/fibered lasts forever. Glad we moved away from using coax though.
Then there is the whole, "hey, let's keep ambient RF/UHF/uWave bands quiet as possible" just for the hell of it and since everything else is likely to work better when not being soaked in broadband em fields.
Follow Ups:
"Then there is the whole, "hey, let's keep ambient RF/UHF/uWave bands quiet as possible" just for the hell of it and since everything else is likely to work better when not being soaked in broadband em fields."
IMO, all government wireless spectrum allocations should sunset fairly quickly. Thereafter all frequency bands should be open for free uss by everyone, subject to spectral power density requirements at property boundaries. In otherwise, allocated like wi-fi. There is no valid engineering or economic excuse for continuing inefficient use of spectrum according to the limitations of 1940's radio technology. Spectrum is not scarce according to the laws of physics. Spectrum is scare due to politics.
Not going to happen soon. Entrenched monopolies own the government.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
but I think the problem is worse than that as the government continues to grow in size and gain power the effect will only get more severe with time.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: