|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
62.228.204.164
In Reply to: RE: Never the problem posted by Gordon Rankin on February 17, 2015 at 07:42:34
Never the only problem is much more correct.
You have just effectively demolished what Tony Lauck says about usb audio here and elsewhere.
You have also acknowledged that it is the hardware/software interaction in a specific system that is at work, and not the simple block diagram that is used to describe usb audio operation to the masses.
Follow Ups:
Fred,
Totally incorrect, I am in total agreement with Tony.
So you want to draw pictures to help everyone out. I think that I brought the procedure to the lowest level of understanding. If you want more just ask for it.
Thanks,
G.
J. Gordon Rankin
What do you agree with and what do you disagree with what I said about TL's pronouncements on the Auralic Vega's tight acceptance window on the ESS input?
Once again I respectfully ask you not to send emails directly to me on your posts in this forum. As far as I am concerned, you do not have the right to transfer the AA email system to that of your own, and I do not wish to have my inbox used for this purpose.
My setting in AA has been not to receive notifications on posts, and this is respected with you as the only exception.
Fred,
I am not sending emails to you in any form. I don't even know what your email is.
Look I agree with TL on everything he says here. The ESS is capable of almost any input as long as it abides to the rules. So for ASYNC input to I2S that means 192x and for SPDIF that means 384, for sync it's less but who cares it's all close enough.
Also I agree with TL that all USB Asynchronous feedbacks should adjust to what ever the input frequency selected is. This is just the way it's suppose to work.
Fred, your an engineer, you should know this stuff by now. Why are you confusing the subject. There is enough missinformation here in this forum to drive people crazy. Don't add to the static.
Thanks,
Gordon
J. Gordon Rankin
I have just received this email from your address on your latest post in response to me below:
''From waudio@cinti.net
Subject New AA post Computer ******
To my email address''
Who sent it?
So, why do I receive from you alone notifications bearing the address
waudio@cinti.net?
I get no other notifications from AA posters but I get this often from presumably you.
What you said about the ESS was not how TL described Auralic's implementation, and this in no way contradicts my point about the lack of information on how the Exact Mode on the Auralic had been implemented.
I assume that you. as a known designer, would not want your work to be classed as defective by someone who has no knowledge of how you'd done it. As an engineer I know so and I would only criticise on the basis of first hand information and intimate knowledge.
As a vendor. I would also assume that, if you state in your product specification, that some feature may not work reliably with some systems, then this would be accepted by reasonable punters, commentaters, and competitors.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: