|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
206.190.136.245
In Reply to: RE: Wrong posted by Chris from Lafayette on January 16, 2015 at 14:04:08
With respect to Pono, Waldrep has zero credibility as he has made several completely incorrect statements. So let's leave him out of this thread.
Follow Ups:
Let's go back to the original discussion - if there is evidence that a critical mass of hi-rez downloads from PONO is indeed hi-rez, as confirmed by spectrographs, then I will gladly concede the point and we can move on. OTOH, if most of it is CD-rez recordings in hi-rez containers, then I'm sure you will do the same. ;-)
And I am certain you are going to examine all of Acoustic Sounds, HDT, and Qobuz files as well for good measure?
When HDT first opened their shop their were numerous upsampled files found, and these were outed by customers..HDT had to realize that the expense of hiring someone to spot check was needed.
I am sure the Pono organization is sitting on pins and needles waiting for you to check they are not selling upsampled CDs so you can concede and they can move on. Right now they are in a living hell of a holding pattern waiting for your results.
with everything he buys.
I suspect PONO will be living at the whim of whatever resolution the record companies decide to send their way.
That's where QOBUZ and TITAL find themselves now, as regards CD quality streams. Just because there is an analog master somewhere in a vault does not mean a record company is gonna take the time to make a new hi rez digital master to send out to PONO when they can use the 16/44.1 that's handy.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: