|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
65.19.76.104
In Reply to: RE: Here's an alternative to "controlled", which I'll probably do, when get around to it: posted by carcass93 on December 11, 2014 at 14:16:10
You are on the right track. But you are not quite there. The problem is that one set of rips would be done earlier than the latter and this might be reflected in the way they got written onto the PC. (For example, the drive might have become fragmented during the course of operations.) I suggest you have your wife randomize the file names first on the original drive. Then you can copy the files in order of file name on to a second drive. Then have her randomize the file names a second time. And then copy them onto a third drive. And then you can do the listening. If you get 8 out of 10 then you will have some traction with me. But then there will be more experiments that can be done to weed out alternative scenarios.
Note: you had best reformat all the drives involved prior to this experiment. And no solid state drives, or spinning rust drives that have any revectored sectors, either. The SSDs are hopeless, because of the revectoring that goes on under the name of "wear leveling". If you were to copy the files into a RAM disk that would be best. Make sure that each file resides on the RAM disk for a minute or two, so that it will be refreshed many times before you listen. You can color me paranoid if you like, but I retain the memory of a high school physics experiment that was supposed to measure acceleration of gravity that ended up measuring the power line frequency.
I could not use my wife for my audio experiments. She explained that she could hear the differences between the amplifiers I was listening to, but she thought it was irrelevant. She told me she could care less about the sounds, rather she was concerned with what the musicians were thinking during the performance. She was a musician, not an audiophile.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
Follow Ups:
Thus, rules can be greatly simplified :-)
God bless your wife Tony. She was a wonderful pianist. But god has forsaken (computer) audiophiles. :)
Thank you.
I am a music lover, and a musician lover where one particular musician was concerned. :-) I do not believe that God has forsaken anyone, not even computer audiophiles or the denizens at Hydrogen Audio.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
Tony, what you say about mood from one listening to another is, I think, overlooked. Music will not sound the same if you listen to it twice. On the second listening, you might might find the music boring, or, on the second listening, you might hear something that you didn't hear first time through. I do not mean that you hear a flute or something that was otherwise obscured; I mean you might suddenly understand the musical idea in a more interesting way. Or you might start thinking that such an experiment is a nerve-wracking and unpleasant idea, and you can't hear the music at all.
Some days my system sounds great; some days it doesn't. It has to do with me and my mood. It's wildly subjective, and the double-blind testing doesn't control for the subjectivity. I think the way to get around the problem is to talk about the music and not the sound.
Living in NYC and listening mostly on recordings to musicians whom I frequently hear live, I find that the thing that recordings cannot reproduce is the sense, when you listen to live music, that you will never hear it again.
I couldn't agree with you more. (I've posted about this before.) We are not the same person the second time we hear a recording or the second time see a beautiful woman. However, if you are concerned about how your system creates airwaves in your room there are ways that you can conduct experiments that control for memory. If you are not well trained and practiced and have excellent concentration and personal discipline, the necessary procedures will not be very efficient, especially if you are tempted to give up and conclude, "Everything sounds the same."
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
And my previous posting is, I think, one possible interpretation of the meaning that Karma is a bitch.
Well, maybe it is true god has not forsaken anyone..:)...but he sure has provided a living hell for many computer 'philes.
Karma is a bitch.
Tony Lauck
"Diversity is the law of nature; no two entities in this universe are uniform." - P.R. Sarkar
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: