|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
98.116.149.172
In Reply to: RE: JPlay has been a NO-OP for me posted by EmailTim on November 25, 2014 at 20:38:46
"Since it is a free country (last time I checked)"
So it is ok for them to have one of their people create a blog post on CA full of misinformation about JPlay... Put up a SEARCHABLE page calling JPlay a "HOAX" and then when the OP in the thread did not want his $$ back they made CA shut down the thread.
Free, true... But people do not really care for bullies.
Follow Ups:
The thread you posted does not appear to come from JRiver. It is a poll asking if JRiver should modify their software or not.I can not comment on a thread that I am not aware of or have not read (do you have a link to the thread in question?).
I just did the search for the other item and read their searchable recommendations page. The word Hoax might be considered a bit strong, but everything else appears acceptable.
I can understand their dilemma of having something that impacts their product and product support. I would not want to waste my company's resources trying to support an undesired configuration of my product, would you?
"... To protect its customers, JRiver will remove forum posts that discuss Jplay. JRiver will not provide support for Media Center if Jplay is used. ..."
Edits: 11/25/14
The thread grew out of another thread on CA dedicated to tips and techniques on the use of JRiver which has been very useful to myself and others. A particular individual wanted to interject his issue with the JRiver/JPlay topic. He was to say the least strong willed and strong minded in his persistence of pursuing a topic within this thread. He was asked and challenged several times by several members including myself to take his issues and complaints elsewhere meaning outside of that particular thread. He then began a separate thread and poll to voice his objections. When the vast majority of participants disagreed with his position his "attitude" deteriorated again. There was some response from personnel from JRiver with one post simply stating there position on JPlay. If there was anyone who was heavy handed in this matter it was the instigator in the first thread and the OP in the next.
Edits: 11/26/14 11/26/14
"He then began a separate thread and poll to voice his objections."
"When the vast majority of participants disagreed with his position his "attitude" deteriorated again. There was some response from personnel from JRiver with one post simply stating there position on JPlay. If there was anyone who was heavy handed in this matter it was the instigator in the first thread and the OP in the next. "
Nice work of fiction.
When will you next book be on Amazon? Fiction sells well.
If it is fiction then it would be in comparison to your pure bs
Well to make this easier for you. Then you are just lying.
The Poll was 62.90% to 33.87% to remove the message. And except for the usually bullies the majority of posts agreed with the OP. JRiver explained nothing about their position regarding JPlay (unless you are you talking about mitchco and his sound card? LOL ) ?
12 minutes after the OP mentioned Facebook Jim offered him a refund. Then the thread get shut down soon after that.
Where is your "vast majority"? smh
I'm talking about the original thread he was crapping in
Ok
Sorry, you did not say that.
I did not read that one. But please take a fair look at the recent one. Pretty clear what went on..
The thread it the one on CA. It is linked already. Yes all they should do is inform and then not support anyone that used their product in an unapproved manner. Anything else is not really appropriate in a civilized society.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: