|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
66.155.23.7
In Reply to: RE: See my question to you about Spread Spectrum below. posted by carcass93 on September 22, 2014 at 09:00:35
Hi,
> I believe that his experience, that it's all that's needed, stems
> from insufficient resolution of the system, in particular the
> computer that is so far from being optimized for audio playback,
> that it masks all the differences introduced by improved power supply.
Well, first, I believe Tony was asking for the physical/electrical process involved.
Second, before you diss someone's system, should you not at LEAST hear it?
Third, I suspect that your experience and Fred's stem from ignoring EE101 and basic physics and thus not fixing glaring, totally brutal "you are f..ked" level problems and trying to put sticky tape over the stable doors after not only the hoses have bolted but after the stable boys burned them down plus the barn and the Masters house and joined the revolution!
A little sticky tape will fix it. No need to actually understand what is going on.
And as a result finding that that any change (including a fly farting at 20' outside your window) changes the sound of the system, which is of course precisely what I would predict.
Fourth, have fun and ignore the man behind the curtain. It does not actually matter.
Ciao T
At 20 bits, you are on the verge of dynamic range covering fly-farts-at-20-feet to untolerable pain. Really, what more could we need?
Follow Ups:
As I said, my experience is diametrically opposite - and so is the experience of many people, who built systems using cMP recipe and its varieties.Going strictly by what you described as your Audio PC, I would not expect the system downstream from it to be truly resolving, because of that bottleneck - that's the extent of my comment about resolution.
Edits: 09/22/14 09/22/14
He said it himself! What I find unacceptable is someone admitting to this, and then boasting that he knew it all on the basis of science.
Signal conditioning and integrity are very basic concepts in electronic measurement and control, and yet some self proclaimed bods steadfastly refuse to accept these are important within a computer.
No point arguing with them as you will see in some of my replies.
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: