|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
184.95.55.18
In Reply to: RE: 2TB is the deal killer posted by LWR on April 21, 2014 at 05:45:38
I agree that limitation is a concern. I too have a massive collection. I spread it over several drives. One huge drive to me poses more risk for failure.
Follow Ups:
One huge drive to me poses more risk for failure.
to run RAID 1 on my otherwise single drive. And maintain a spare drive for the mirror. Along with backups on four external USB drives.
> I spread it over several drives. One huge drive to me poses more risk for failure.
I think it depends on the probability of failure for the specific drive. Are larger drives more likely to fail? You still have to have backups for each drive regardless of size. However, if a large drive fails, it will take a lot longer to make another backup of a 6-TB drive compared to a 2-TB drive. On the other hand, the more drives you have the more failures you might also experience. It really boils down to whether larger 6-TB drives have greater probability for failure than smaller 2-TB drives.
Best regards,
John Elison
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: