|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
70.166.121.142
In Reply to: RE: ideal settings posted by fmak on April 15, 2014 at 11:00:26
ideal setting should mean ideal performance. You'll never know what those settings are until you've assembled the system.
You might have a recommended or default settings as a starting point but the end user has to determine what is ideal.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
Follow Ups:
sounds different, you have no idea what the 'ideal' settings are.
Programming with your kind of stab at the truth is like wheel spinning, not knowing when it'll stop.
I give a 'hot-off-the-press' example. The Thyscon 1.61 usb2 audio driver works properly in Win Server 2012 and is in the 64 bit Program file. The updated versions of the same XMOS driver won't even install. Why? If the programming has been 'ideal' ' the drivers have been around for a long while'
Any setup or configuration prior to installation is a shot in the dark.
In this case the end users are audiophiles (not programmers) and they more than anyone else should understand how to figure out the ideal settings. If this is not the case they shouldn't be messing with these kinds of systems - but lo and behold they will and they'll revel in their wonderful results in spite on knowing not what they do.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
This is poppycock and if user settings are up to airplane pilots and train drivers, then god help the world.
This kind of reasoning demonstrates a lack of intellectual rigour and honesty on the part of some software providers; exactly what I have been saying.
Airplane controls are a part of a system that is meticulously calibrated to produce accurate results prior to the pilots ever seeing them.
A PC audio system is a conglomeration of parts that needs to be meticulously calibrated by the end user (or someone he pays to do it) in order to achieve accurate results.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
''A PC audio system is a conglomeration of parts that needs to be meticulously calibrated by the end user'' Poppycock!!!
You must be a shareholder in MS,HP or whatever. There is no logic in asserting this for any consumer product and is an assumption that lets companies make profit without responsibility.
Just about every professional electronic device under goes calibration on a regular basis. If you've ever worked in an engineering lab or hospital you will know and understand how important it is that these devices remain calibrated. Normally this calibration is done by individuals outside the group using the equipment or an outside company altogether.
And all of this after a system has been built, configured and calibrated and passed production testing.
And here you are claiming one should be able to assemble a system and get "ideal" results without calibration?
You're wrong!
Give me rhythm or give me death!
instead of posting unrelated points.
I am a professional engineer and you are talking way over your field of knowledge.
Period.My points are simple and exactly on point. You just don't get it - it's poppycock you saide.
You might be somekind of tech school product or an actually engineer with 0 experience in product development and manufacturing.
Give me rhythm or give me death!
Edits: 04/16/14 04/16/14
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: