|
Audio Asylum Thread Printer Get a view of an entire thread on one page |
For Sale Ads |
69.228.95.180
In Reply to: RE: On the other hand... posted by Thornhill on May 24, 2012 at 20:06:06
Let's see: I've seen productions in Munich (many), Salzburg, Vienna, Berlin, Covent Garden, Rome, LaScala, the Met (twice), L.A. and San Francisco. Everyone in the ticket line, or seated near me, whom I bothered to ask had never seen that nite's opera before.
I know no one other than critics and a few extremely bored operaphiles who spend big money just because they have to see some new production. Like most people I want great conducting, fine orchestral playing, and above all, great singing. Productions are unimportant unless they interfere with getting the story across, as happens so often now with Wagner (you really want the Dutchman to be gay, Sachs a pedophile, or similar outlandish stuff? Be my guest.)
Follow Ups:
Let's see: I've seen productions in Munich (many), Salzburg, Vienna, Berlin, Covent Garden, Rome, LaScala, the Met (twice), L.A. and San Francisco. Everyone in the ticket line, or seated near me, whom I bothered to ask had never seen that nite's opera before.I'm sorry, but observational data is meaningless. I've been a subscriber to the Met Opera for 6 years; compared to the people who sit around me, I'm a virgin -- I've met countless people who've have subscriptions since the early 1980s. But I'm not going to claim that's representative of the house on all nights.
We have hard data with the Met -- an accurate estimate of their number of donors -- and in the performing arts field, the only individuals who give you money are the people who attend your shows (as someone who works in the performing arts, I can speak with some authority on this).
I know no one other than critics and a few extremely bored operaphiles who spend big money just because they have to see some new production.
What does that have to do with anything? Many, many people spend more on sports tickets than opera tickets. My Met tickets are $180/seat. Sounds like a lot, but my father's Eagles tickets are only slightly less, there are more home games in a season than shows in a Met subscription, and when the team is playing the Giants or the Cowboys, he has no problem getting 2 to 3 times face value for the tickets (and for Monday night games, the sky is the limit).
Productions are unimportant
If productions are unimportant then people would dispense with them and just do in-concert opera.
Edits: 05/24/12
If a production is counter to the composer's explicit directions, does not convey story content, or presents a perverse, contrived, or mostly incomplete version of the work's message, it should never be staged in the first place, nor is it likely to endure.
I think this is what Chris means by "Eurotrash" direction, a waste of everyone's time and money.
won't be "disappointed" by anything resembling novelty, imagination, or innovation.
"Say Mr. Picasso, could you just paint me one of those pink ones, please?"
...that the novelty, imagination and innovation is executed at the expense of tradition and historical accuracy. Instead of mucking with classic art, the contemporary productions should start with NEW music and NEW operas -- expand the art form, rather than taking the lazy route and doing half the job. Let's deface the Mona Lisa and call it postmodernism. That way, we can call a crime art.
nt
d
Post a Followup:
FAQ |
Post a Message! |
Forgot Password? |
|
||||||||||||||
|
This post is made possible by the generous support of people like you and our sponsors: